Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20170426203615/@comment-10473115-20170502193736

1) Method #2 is much better. Other option was confusing at least for me. 2) Yes, it would be very helpful. 3) Strong no. It's not a problem if chronology notes are on a dedicated section at the bottom of the page. I don't like these new tags, World War Hulk Vol 1 5 is a good example how these clutter appearances section and their only purpose is to tell that there's something written in the chronology notes section. I would prefer TOC over these linked tags and non-linked over linked ones but would prefer to omit those altogether. Readers who are interested can find the information without any tags. I also think that we shouldn't use flashback or -forward tags when those are used just as a story-telling device.