Thread:Nausiated/@comment-5111077-20140730210211/@comment-61022-20140730211711

Can you define "vandalism"? Because I've been taking a look at this persons edits and all they are doing is lines here and there that are really just matters of opinion. Vandalism is if they're writing inappropriate things, grossly incorrect information, or adult pictures on pages on the Wiki.

If you think changing categories or character positions (good/bad/neutral) is vandalism, I think you need to take a deep breath.

These are subjective things and honestly I don't understand why people get in such a huff over something so trivial.

If you can post some links of actual vandalism I'll do something about. However, if you have such issue with what this person is contributing to the site, perhaps you should try being a human being and talk to them? And I don't mean flat out attacking them and saying they're wrong. Have a discussion with them on their wall and keep it respectful. In other words talk like adults.

Because frankly I don't see anything that they are posting that is "wrong" in the sense that the information they're adding is not really "incorrect" per se (For example, changing Eddie Brock from good, to bad, to neutral, is trivial. His "side" changes frequently that it hardly matters).

Also keep in mind that if I see an edit war between you and this other person, I have *very* little patience for such nonsense and whoever is the most rude and aggressive about it is going to get banned. Just a fair warning. So keep it respectful and talk things out with this person if you have issue with what they are contributing. The whole point of a wiki is that it's open source and people can discuss ideas. Kind of defeats the purpose if you can't talk about it like rational adults and making nebulous accusations to an administrator.

In other words, sort it out among yourselves, if it gets ugly for whatever reason then ask an admin to arbitrate.