Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20180921212157/@comment-61022-20190511091643

I haven't looked but if we're going to give them another chance we should look to see if they were contributing to other Fandom eikis during their downtime and determine two things:

Primary: were they having issues with admins on that wiki and if they were was it a one-and-done situation that comes with newbies on a wiki and...

Secondary: were their edits considered of value to that other wiki.

On the second point: were they making quality edits. It's one thing to fix a grammatical error or change a syntax. Those kind of edits are a dime a dozen. However if they were making detailed fact based edits that are based on solid research that's a valuable contributor.

I'm more of a quality over quantity person. The ban was here (as far as I know) so if they spent the past seven months doing nothing at all then I don't feel they have done anything to prove themselves. There are countless wikis and I don't belive that one person can only have one interest. If they really wanted to be part of the Fandom community they would have contributed elsewhere on another site.

To be clear, I haven't looked to see if that is the case or not, I am just positing some of my ideas on the subject in a general sense.

I think if we got someone that wants back in and they have proven they have good behavior elsewhere and have done quality edits in that other domain we should at least consider the idea. Especially after so much time.