Thread:Eetmi/@comment-16461120-20160224005242/@comment-10473115-20160303002456

ADour wrote: The thing is that a photo appearance is not a mention, or similar to it. I think it would be better to make it so the "Photo" appearance template simply doesn't autocategorize anything at all. I disagree that it shouldn't categorize at all. I think that we should categorize everything which could help researching and photo appearance can be very meaningful to character history. It isn't a mention but a new category for photo appearances would be counterproductive as there are so few of them.