Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1820614-20150731024240/@comment-1820614-20150831035613

To try and keep it short, you are the only person I have ever talked to that applies atheism to a singular, divine creator of all existence. Every other atheist I have talked to or source I have read about it applies to to either a singular God or multiple gods in general. A large part of the rest of your argument comes from that.

And the Reed Richards/afterlife part, within the context I have always read it as he was arguing afterlives in general do not exist since he goes on to say all one does in one's present life is what matters. This an interpretation other people on other boards held when I have seen it discussed. And the presence of heaven/hell afterlives is well established in this case Richards is outright ignoring evidence.

Since we are talking on two entirely different wavelengths I don't see what else there is to discuss between the two of us. The reason I asked in the first place was I was wondering about the reasoning the writers might be using for their characterizations. It does not bother me, but I do wonder why your wrote a wall of text in response.