Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-3048593-20160419182203/@comment-3406131-20160420123134

Hi.

On the multiversal renewal thing, there is still no proof previous universe were 616. Regarding the various statement in and out comics, the reference to other universes and "reborn" universes doesn't confirm it was 616 as far. The 7-8th iteration is obviously different from the 6-7th (Reed Richards recreated his world, that's different from "big bang-big crunch", even if Battleworld is similar in the great scheme from the Cosmic Egg). (I'm not sure what I can do with that, but even Eternity (Earth-"0") isn't the same entity that Eternity (Earth-616).)

On Earth-0/Earth-92131 thing, I contacted via mail Jeff Christansen who told me Adventures of the X-Men wasn't in Earh-92131 (which means also at least one of the Spider-Man title (who has a crossover) as well). He was the one stating Earth-0 wasn't a real designation in that same mail (can upload it if you want).

Like AnnabellRice said, you can find more informations on Talk:Earth-0. I can't find back the entry mentioning the birth of the Brothers (who happens in Adventures of X-Men), but Galactus entry in Annihilation The Nova Corps Files (and other entries) mentions the events of Adventures of X-Men (a demon shattering the Mkraan, radiation plague, etc).

If the events aren't clearly named (no issues, not often the designations (but there is no designation known for this reality anyway), and that's often the case in handbooks), the fact of using those events seems enough to me (or else we can't trust any connexion made in handbooks...) (Also the "this is not the same continuity because there is such thing different..." isn't enough)

I'm sorry, I can't stay here for a longer message.