Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161124005352/@comment-16461120-20161129205925

I'm opposed to the notion that you said it's unnecessary to note that there are flashbacks and flashforwards if they're simply augmenting the main story within any given issue.

To clarify, I agree that I could do a better job helping with issue summaries and notes, so that it's easier for those inclined to work the APN tags to establish a continuity. (Right now I'm a bit overwhelmed with real life health concerns, so my thinking is a bit clouded by pain and medications, and as such am many dozens of stories behind where I had hoped I'd be today, but will strive to improve there when able.)

Perhaps the solution is expansion of strategy employed by the automatic citation generating tags such as and  where it would say something like , followed by the reference with the longer, less aesthetically pleasing clarification regarding whether that includes flashbacks and/or flashforwards in the references section directing readers to the notes?