Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-867021-20121206144439/@comment-867021-20121209155548

Ok, this gripe is directed at Nathan. He has posted before that he does not consider the function of a bcrat to resolve the disputes between admins. Recently he posted that he was concerned in the past about making admins in the event that the "relationship soured". To my mind, his thinking is not consistent along these lines. Who determines what "relationship soured" means? Let me guess. That warm and fuzzy feel good term 'consensus'. Bullshit. We're all different people with different personalities from different walks of life. That's what makes the world an interesting place. It's why I think we need a grievance policy. And if we have a grievance policy, we should have a demotion policy otherwise it's toothless. Obviously one of the bcrats needs to push for such adoption because from a practical point of view, only Jamie or Nathan can change our status. You know, it's funny. With all the changes I envision to the political organization here, I might end up by a victim of the system I championed. But I'd rather there be a system in place then the ARBITRARY DECISION by SOME GUY.