Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20180921212157/@comment-4548390-20180922180741

I'm still against bringing them back. One thing that wasn't brought up, but that should've been given their insistence in giving unofficial names to pages despite warnings, is that their edits should've been called into question after their block. For example, around the time Doctor Strange and the Sorcerer Supreme was being published, Gipdac had been updating the Cloak of Levitation page as if it was the same cloak Wiccan wore despite them not being stated to be one and the same in none of its appearances. How many misinformations like this one are still around? We'll probably never known given the extent of their edits, and the difficult to check some of the issues used as reference. Now, I can sound a little too exaggerated here since I'm talking about some of their edits that I'm aware of, but I'd rather have an empty page than a page with false information.