Thread:Edkaufman/@comment-4537153-20120507004729/@comment-4537153-20120508011213

I hear what you are saying and with that in mind I have another question.

You said "not not because theres is a policy as such, but simply because of common sense"

Now did you mean that as the reason you agree with Warblade is because of common sense and there is no policy, or do you mean you agree with Warblade because of common sense even though there is a policy. The reason I ask is because I looked for the policy and guidelines and didn't find anything that says there has to be a limit of details that could used. Which is why I asked you as an admin to verify if there was one or not.

Now the reason I bring that up is because there are many other articles that follow the same pattern as I used on the Loki (Earth-199999) page, though not to that great of an extent since there have only been two movies that Loki has appeared in compared to hundreds of say Hulk comics. Concerning the comics point, I agree listing every feat is very excessive but the Hulk (Earth 616) page does list more specific feats in it than the Loki (Earth-199999) page does. And the hulk is not the only one. The Cyclops (Earth-616) description of his Optic Blast is very detailed and I enjoyed it and I also enjoyed the great many detail in the Spider-man (Earth-616) powers and abilties details and descriptions.

As I have explained to Warblade that there are some editors and readers who agree with his POV concerning the amount of info in the powers and abilities section or any other section but there are obviously editors and writers who agree with my POV aswell who like details. That was the reason I ask if there was a policy because it is not just us two.

Let's say for example that you take Warblade and myself out of the situtation and a 3rd editor changes the page to fit my POV, then fourth editor comes an changes it to Warblade's POV, and then a different fifth editor changes it to my POV and so on and so on. I'm sure you know where I'm going with this.

The question is: If there is no "policy" that says it should be one way or another, how do we (all editors) determine how the pages should ultimately end up.

After my last edit on the Loki (Earth-199999) page I haven't touched it since, and soon after Warblade changed it again. After that is was changed back to fit my POV by a different third editor and was editied again by a different editor but still match my POV. The only one who has changed it so differently so far is Warblade.

Now I know that it would be naive to believe that there are not any others who agree with Warblade's POV but without a policy that says it has to be one way or another, how do we decide how it will end up. Because that would mean we are both right. And if a decision is made, will it be for the Loki (Earth-199999) alone or will it have to be placed into effect with every page on this wikia. Will it be consistant or just specific pages in question.

Now concerning the previous connections: I was not speaking directly of the Jotun/jotun issue but that this would have been the fourth debate we would have had and based on the last one where neither one of us would back down I wanted to get ahead start on getting a conclusion.

I'm not vindictive to Warblade nor have a wrote to or about him/her is a negative way. As I said before I don't feel everything he/she has edited is unnecessary. The edit he/she did on the Loki (Earth-199999) title The Tesseract was good. Kudos to him/her. But as an editor I don't feel good when someone changes my work to where I feel it is unnecessary.

Spelling: I have make mistakes, I'm not perfect, I never will be, and I will most likely make mistakes in the futures, we all have and we all will. I don't mind if people corrects any mispelling I have made. Sometimes I catch myself later and change it and sometimes I catch other editor's misspellings and change it. We all do.

Sorry if I rambled on too much.