Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-1009000-20150701181200

Allright people, as much fun as I'm having reading about D&D and hearing anti-capitalist rants about Marvel (seriously, dude - do ask one of the writers how much they make... I dare you) - we're getting off topic.

The suggestion for a new peer review system has been heard - as Undoniel and MRkermit pointed out, your version is not practical, but we have been in fact discussing peer review. As you may know, on our sister wiki, main character pages are protected on priniciple. So far, we have kept main characters like Spider-Man, Hulk and Cap unprotected, because we trust the self-control system that includes all users, but to be honest, our main character pages are much more unorganized thann the DC wiki's as a result.

As has been pointed out before - our mission is to document, not to interpret. Including a D&D-related system is out of the question. Besides - the idea of a psychological alignment is very much a leftover from the golden age where heroes were infallible paragons and villans were vile criminals. Society and science have moved beyond those categories and so have the comics - not the least because they target an older audience nowadays.

There is an indecent amount of time being spent on discussions and edit wars about powers (MY HERO IS BETTER/STRONGER/FASTER THAN YOURS), alignments (CYCLOPS IS EVIL! NO HE IS NOT!) and silly categories that add nothing of value to the page. Time that could be spent reading comics (which is what i still suppose is the main reason we're here) and transferring that information in the form of summaries and images over to the site.

As for Nausiated's post: He pointed to his veteran status in relation to the trouble a fan-debate category like alignment brings. He has in no way insinuated he is infallible because of this. What he is, however, is one of the most diligent and industrious contributors to this website. So insulting him by arguing that what this site needs is a few "fresh faces" is, quite frankly, out of line.

As I pointed out - thanks everyone for the inputs, the admins will consider them and make a decision.