Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5104557-20130701134931/@comment-3406131-20130702030035

Don't really see your point here.

To be fair, I haven't really followed this part of the story about Changelings (and I thought that Hope Summers' birth could have been a good way to keep on it)

From what I've understood: A mutant born with an active X-Gene at some around his birth and not around his puberty is a Changeling.

For me, it's kind of bullshit, as the Inferno Babies and many others of different ages (I think but without examples) have proved that the trigger is oftenly a stress, and not specifically the puberty (who can be one).

To be more correct on the category text, I have:
 * Corrected the link
 * Added "supposedly" in the text
 * Added a short descriptive text defining Changelings

I think that the second point was kind of the problem ? To be fair, I think (but I surely have missed lot of issues) that except for Tryp and Madrox, nobody is in comics described as Homo Killcrop, and even those two aren't really confirmed. So we add every mutants confirmed to have mutated from his X-Gene at a time around his birth.
 * So I don't see why remove Xavier from the list: He was able to process to a psy-scan, and try a psy-kill before being born. It's already a proof of a great mutant power, without training. So at his birth, they kind of shut down, but he had them before his puberty. A possible example who could turn out in a similar way could be the Sixth Light.

For now, until further (probably sadly never-coming) information, I would say we have to kept them into that category.

Talking about the Changelings, I was thinking about the Inferno Babies. Shouldn't they be listed as Changelings, as they were "mutant babies" (and Cable is listed among them and among the Changelings)