Board Thread:Policies/@comment-867021-20121204175146/@comment-1713281-20121206204910

To clarify. Do I think we need a better system then someone going "We need a new admin, So-n-So hasn't been around in a while. What about User:Johnson?", and those who see it going "Yeah sure"? Yes I do. That's hardly efficient.

But at the same time I still think we have a decent amount of staff already. Again, I point out that we have 10 staff members (or 7 if you want to nitpick; Jamie doesn't contribute data anymore, Robert is here periodically since he contributes to so many wikis, and Etrit hasn't been on in a while). And more than that, we have a very small community here. I'd hate to see us lose good contributors because we vote against making them admins.

I'm not saying we don't need a proper system, we honestly do, but I do think we need it for when the occassion arises, not just becuse we have good contributors that we want to reward for being good contributors.