Thread:Edkaufman/@comment-4537153-20120507004729/@comment-4537153-20120508080752

This is the first time I've heard the KISS term. Interesting, but who among us (any of us) can say what is neccessary or overdetailed concerning some topics. Isn't the point of the Wikia site accurate details that can be backed up (references). As I said before I agree with you when you say that listing every feat is excessive but many different editors have differing opinions about what is excessive and what is overdetailed.

Sometimes details can tell a story just as much as the main body paragraphs. I know that I have looked into and read far more graphic novels because of the details I have found. And many of the information in the powers and abilities section are not found in the main body paragraphs and I (for ex..) would not have know about many things concerning the character or item in question. And I'm probably not the only one who has read more because of the information found. It leads to others reading and researching with it turn leads to more descriptive information edited througout the entire page. At least that has been my experience.

I was just looking over the voting for the Avengers Battle Royal, where the editors voted on who would win in a show down where Thor won. Maybe a vote could be made possible to see if a majority decision amongst the editors can be reached. Have it open for a month or so to have enough time for word of mouth to spread.

Don't get me wrong I'm not argumentitive. It's just that I realize we all have differing opinions concerning what is neccessary and what is not. Not that I'm saying either one of us is right. Just that ours opinions differ.