Thread:Pokemonmewtwos/@comment-16461120-20160327201321/@comment-16461120-20160327202735

Okay, appreciate the explanation, it means whomever added the information there likely plagiarized it word for word from elsewhere then, so I'll have to ferret that out instead. Regardless it's a good example of why simply copying what someone else put on another article here isn't the best idea when creating new articles, 'cause it erroneously implied you were responsible since in that instance the edit history notes you as the sole author. Anyway, thanks for the prompt reply and help hopefully resolving the issue by finding the true source.