Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161026191028/@comment-61022-20180627210550

ADour wrote: I'm not in favor of dropping the "Marvel's" from an article's name.

Not in favor because...? It'd be nice to know your reasons why you are not in favor of this. Or is this just another instance of ADour being contrary for the sake of being contrary?

ADour wrote: Additionally, I don't think the idea to include a show's network is actually helpful. Using "(TV series)" as a distinguish is enough, or "([Year] TV series)" if there is more than one show with the same name.

How is it not helpful? Using my Spider-Man example, if someone was talking about a Spider-Man in general conversation. IE "Hey, I like the Spider-Man cartoon" and you're like "which one", they usually clarify by year or what network it was on.

For characters that don't have many shows under their belt that might seem useless to you, however, the point is to make everything needs to be uniform. In addition, as I pointed out, at least using the ([Year] TV Series) adheres to other Wikis. The addition of a network was just an additional identifier for better sorting.

But by all means, tell me how a Wikipedia standard practical.

ADour wrote: On a side note, why would TV series alone require in their article's title the name of their network? I already stated I'm not in favor of the idea, but shouldn't a similar principle be used in movies or video games for consistency?

I'd be for that as well actually since my suggestion wasn't just specific to TV Shows. In fact, it would appear to be even more practical for video games considering the sheer volume of games that come out.

Perhaps a NAME (YEAR DEVELOPER GAME) would be easiest. Especially with a character like Spider-Man who has had over 50 video games made about him since the 1980s (a number that will get larger thanks to mobile games which will not make differentiating any easier too I might add).

Anyway, can you tell us why you are not in favor, yet another one of my suggestions? Some constructive criticism from your corner would be nice for a change.