Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-4548390-20160905163752/@comment-4548390-20161110074503

Hufflepuffgirl28 wrote: The Many-Angled One wrote: Hufflepuffgirl28 wrote: and "giving a comic a chance" doesn't mean it will be good/get better, BMB's Guardians of the Galaxy was objectively Very Bad and ran for 32 issues, while Tom King's Vision only ran for 12 issues but was a masterpiece and had a complete story arc... if it had gone any longer it would have felt dragged out and if they had started another arc the message and story would have felt less genuine. The Vision series ended by issue #12 because Tom King became an exclusive DC writer, so there was no way he could continue it, and I doubt someone would want to take the reigns of the series after he left. He was going to write Vote Loki also, but you know already what happened. Yeah, I know Tom King left for DC, but he made a descision when and how the series ended. I'm just trying to make the point that short series are sometimes much better than long, drawn out ones, it doesn't really have anything to do with why it ended. Oh, okay. I agree with you in that. I personally would feel better if they just adopted a different way of relaunching, like giving a subtitle to their serieses whenever they were relaunched. For example: Carnage continued into Carnage, U.S.A.