Thread:Nurdboy42/@comment-31124610-20171014060437/@comment-16461120-20171014080341

1./2. In addition to failing to use a template, as well as failing to provide proper citation to indicate which Marvel sources the content specifically pertained to, you plainly admit you plagiarized the content from another wikia, which is more than enough reason to assume the article was contrary to the Marvel Database:Policies and Guidelines, so I believe the deletion was justified, even if I think "vandalism" was the wrong term to describe the reasoning behind the action.

3. We don't host content that didn't happen in an actual comic. We separate myth from the in-universe fictional character, so what he was saying is that the article appeared to contain out-of-universe content, which combined with the utter lack of citation, gave no indication which part of it may have happened in the comics, and which part was just plagiarized from elsewhere.

Lastly, Nurdboy42 was selected by his peers to serve as content moderator, and that community consensus appointment gives him the authority to do exactly that, moderate the content on behalf of the community in coordination with the database's administrators. It's not based upon his standards, it's our standards, community standards, and there's absolutely nothing dirty about it. He has a tough job and he does it well. We're all just human's volunteering our time, so sometimes things could be handled better, but the important part is that we continually learn to work together, and the community grows stronger as a result.