Thread:Nausiated/@comment-1895174-20121111221650/@comment-61022-20121111231707

My position is because the character in question is (as stated in the notes section)

"Dr. Who's only appearance in a Marvel title was in the Marvel UK reprint of the one-off title Dr. Who & the Daleks, an adaptation of the movie of the same title originally published by Dell Comics in 1966."

So basically it's a character who is based on a movie adaptation. So it's along the same lines as creating a profile for Indiana Jones or Star Wars characters.

If we were talking about the Earth-5556 character, I could see how there was a valid argument here. But that's not the case.

I'd also like to point out that the obscure characters that I have referenced are all considered part of mainstream Marvel continuity, while I agree that arguing the relevance on either subject is splitting hairs, I am basing my opinion on the going policies about commercially licensed characters that have appeared in Marvel publications.

Hope that clears up my position.