Thread:Euji/@comment-22439-20160212201204/@comment-26732083-20160217021417

Mrkermit wrote: Euji wrote: Well I guess it was kind of impolite of me to just change it all willy-nilly in the first place Not at all, editing what you see as wrong is only way to improve things. I think that most important guidelines for being a good editor for any wiki are well presented at Wikipedia; [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold BE BOLD] and [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith ASSUME GOOD FAITH].

Undoniel wrote: Well, I know there is some stigma with the word "prostitute", but we should leave it where it belongs: in the minds of those who wants to create that stigma. It's not like we're using an explicitly offensive term, but a common term that we use without judgment. While I agree how you arranged the categories and using the word prostitute, we can't leave out hidden meanings of words by saying we don't have them. In public speech or writing we can't define those connotations, we have to take them as given and act accordingly. Sex worker and prostitute aren't fully interchangeable words; child prostitute, child sex worker or prostituted child all seem to have a different meaning. It's good that we're working on fiction and can mostly leave those debates to real world.

That's a good motto, so much to learn.

Also, I agree with everything you said.