Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-26326763-20150701174009

Undoniel wrote: The history text would do that, if people were not that lazy that they think "good", "bad" or "neutral" defines anything, instead of writing the history and let people judge. Or simply wrote an article body, who would be way more simple, but which is never done because of editors' laziness. Not on this site. Waaaay too complicated to establish, too heavy to use... The moral axis does not define everything, which is why D&D expanded on it with the ethical axis. The history for some characters are long & storied whilst others it is but a name & a picture. So people who wish to make a quick check on a character or a version of a character, usually have either a chunk to dig through, or they are left scratching their heads. Why are the editors so lazy? And what are you doing to encourage new editors to join & curb edit wars? Unless you have tighter control method for edits, the CK's suggestion is the best way to go, regardless of the effort required from the existing moderators to put it into place, as it is curbs the edit war problem.