Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20190321112411/@comment-10473115-20190321222838

LoveWaffle wrote: Eh. As it stands, the "Other Characters" section tends to be where all the minor appearances, cameos, and mentions settle. I'm all for finally codifying whether or not those automatically go to the bottom of their respective sections, but that functionally serves the same purpose as what you propose. But we have also other sections after Other Characters so separating minor appearances to own section would look quite different than just rearranging those within their current section.

I agree with Copeinator that the voting is little premature and we could benefit from more discussion. I fear that there's so many new things in the proposal that it's little difficult to form an opinion and most important thing (to me) gets hidden, separating minor appearances in the listing as we do in the categorization. That would really improve readability of long lists. For anyone interested, we have discussed a little about this as an off-topic subject in Thread:1261145.

There is an error in the proposal as Mentions are a separate category apart from Minor Appearances. If we decide to replace some repetitive tagging with section headers, we would need a new template for those mentions. But that would be no problem.

I think that it would be beneficial to split the proposal to smaller pieces and see if we can find a consensus to some of them without voting.
 * 1) Should we separate Minor Appearances and Mentions to new appearance section?
 * 2) What else should be listed there? Appearances without a page to link, redundant nested locations, humans in species section, generic animal species(if we decide to list them at all)?
 * 3) Where this section should be placed on the page?
 * 4) Can we replace repetitive tagging with section headers?