Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-24091837-20150701164256

Cyber-Shadow6 wrote: Primarch Guilliman wrote: Nausiated wrote: As for alignments: Equally as pointless. Commander Kazugeta, you've written at length and tediously about keeping them but I should point out that you have only been here since February this year. Versus me, I've been here for a decade, and I have been an admin for quite a while as well. Alignments are more trouble than they are worth and are just as pointless to list as fan ratings. They're subjective, arbitrary, and subject to change and the subject of many edit wars.

If someone can't figure out an alignment by reading the actual character profile, then perhaps they need to go back to reading comprehension. Nausiated, you clearly think your being here longer means your opinions are somehow infallible. Just because someone is newer to contributing to this particular wikia or wikias in general, doesn't not mean they are wrong & you can use your length of service to a particular wikia(s) as some sort of weapon to strengthen a weaker point. He brings a perspective that is less jaded & different to most others. You should pay more attention to the young bloods & not so quick to dismiss their views. Considering that Nausiated has been active on Wikia for far longer than either you or Kazugeta, might it be possible that he's a little more experienced?

Why do you assume he is right (or at least has a point of equal strength) due to length of service? He came across as rather condescending when he played the length of time active on wikia card. That's just means he is more likely to be jaded, and thus no longer objective. He even swore in regard to the editing wars, thus proving that a large amount of frustration & jaded-ness is present in that regard. You people need get it out of your heads that length of service means you can power-trip & use it to back up poor arguments.