Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20160411204652/@comment-3406131-20160501131248

Mrkermit wrote: I removed the delete tag from the article. However, I see that there were some misunderstanding about my purposes. I was only proposing to stop categorizing human characters, like it's done at DC Database. Although we now have decided to continue categorizing human characters, we should consider to differentiate category of list of characters from category as humans as a topic. I still would tend to have everything complete, including the most trivial thing (but only on the way "everything we know", so in the case of the information "human", it's not always really known), so in any case, it's fine for me (but we have to deal with the way to deal "humans" in the larger meaning (and the Genus Homo/Humans/Homo sapiens distribution of categories)).

Mrkermit wrote: We don't have any category policy and therefore our categories are quite illogical but the article shouldn't normally be categorized to both parent and child categories. So as previously stated, Peter Parker and all other possible Human Mutates would still be human. As all Deviant Mutates are still Deviants but are not listed on parent category. Just to be clear, all Deviant Mutates aren't Deviants, some being simply Deviants experiments and other monstrous Deviants (All-New Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe Update #3) (I had started to create two pages but got sucked up by other stuff).

Deviant mutates (monstrous deviants) ARE in the parent category: Category:Deviants (Homo descendus). Category:Deviants is a portal category for different Deviants' stuff. And monstrous deviants also are listed among the Deviants.

The problem is more I hadn't sorted all cases of Deviant mutates, so we still have two category linked to the Deviants (Homo descendus), when there should be one to the Deviants and the other to Deviant experiments.

Mrkermit wrote: We should add Species field to character infobox. I took a brief look at our previous discussions about the subject and it was obvious that the field hasn't been added because we were looking for too complicated solution. We should just add the field without any autocategorization and start a separate discussion for it on Module talk:CharacterInfobox. Works for me, can't wait to have something working (I was never really a fan of the module, except for being sure that all fell in the right ("Strontian" on the page leading to the category "Strontians") and exceptions (like "Deviant" leading to "Deviants (Homo descendu)" for example).