User blog comment:JoePlay/The Avengers Battle Royale - Mano a Mano/@comment-4644597-20120501174611

You know what I have come to really dislike about this contest? Not that it's a popularity contest, I've lived to accept that. It's that people just use the wings and the losses a character has accumulated over their career without the context backing said wins and losses. The biggest example I can think of recently is Captain America vs Iron Man. Yes two times in the civil war Captain America was able to get the better of Iron Man, once through the help of the Vision, the other time with a device given to him by Nick Fury. The truth of the matter is though without those Cap doesn't stand a chance as now Iron Man moves faster than he does, thanks to his battle computer he can predict Cap's moves and he's so many times stronger it's not even close to fair. He also has dozens of weapons, can regenerate and has his armor of course. Granted I'm seeing Iron Man winning which is great but it still makes me sad so many people are misinformed.

To Thor Hulk I personally think most the time Thor is the more powerful of the two, but that can change writer to writer, so I don't feel bad if Hulk wins.