User blog comment:LoveWaffle/2014 Preview/@comment-2145732-20140119023231/@comment-1895174-20140119225551

Well if that's not the most inane thing I've read all day. Why do you care so much about Godzilla? Are you an advertiser for it or something? Because a user who's only active on a Marvel wiki to have upwards of 80% of his edits (also all of them made within the past 2 years) be about the Godzilla reboot and have nothing to Marvel comics or its properties is dangerously bordering on SPAM. Yeah, 300 isn't about superheroes, but it is based on a comic book. That's half of what matters, remember? Perhaps you should read before you continue to spam your Godzilla nonsense.

But, since you've made an issue of it, fine, here's my take on Godzilla

''An incredibly juvenile, stupid-looking movie that's going to emphasize city-destroying CGI nonsense over any kind of cohesive storytelling or strong characterization. That makes parts of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, the G. I. Joe movies, and Star Trek Into Darkness unwatchable, but at least those movies relegated that chaos to smaller parts of the film. Godzilla puts that stuff front-and-center. Not helping is star Aaron Taylor-Johnson, whose bland performances in the Kick-Ass movies drag down what could otherwise be fun material. Don't expect much in terms of acting out of him; he's at best Shia LaBeouf in the Tramsformers movies. Not like you could find much of that in the original, 1954 movie though, but that movie and its sequels coasted on the inherent camp of seeing people dressed up like giant monsters destroying a miniature Tokyo and on the uniqueness of the central monster. A Godzilla reboot that plays it straight and makes its monster a CGI nightmare is going to have neither. You want to see a recently-awoken giant lizard with heat breath destroy a city? Go watch Smaug do it instead, and stay far, far away from Godzilla. Outlook: 2014's answer to John Carter and The Lone Ranger''

Happy now? Hype does not equal quality.