Thread:Jamieb18/@comment-11220539-20190407162129/@comment-27061671-20190407205750

You seem to have misunderstood my point which was that you put too much of an emphasis on having new content be absolutely perfect and are exceedingly quick to point out when it isn't but you don't place the same emphasis on older content living up to those standards. I never suggested, or meant to suggest that 'other people not following the rules as a reason we shouldn't make sure you do too' I suggested that if you made the same efforts to police ALL content rather than just the new you'd likely get more done and see greater overall results given that there's a greater wealth of incorrect older content than there is incorrect newer content. By all means continue to ride me and other newer users (although I've been editing since November last year so I'm not that new) on any tiny mistake you care to ferret out but perhaps live by your own rules and ensure that content that has been uncorrected, and whose incorrect information has not been noticed, for over a year should also undergo the same level of near instantaneous scrutiny to be fair and to make for a more accurate wiki.