Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-4565067-20140125045035/@comment-122657-20140416194525

Yes, that's exactly right, ShoelessMonkey. The problem is the sorting. We can get the 16-at-a-time paged result in a list, but it won't be sortable because that has to happen within a sortable table. I'll take a look at it again to be sure, but I'm fairly certain it is still not possible (yet).