Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-95817-20150812202239/@comment-95817-20150815014619

Nausiated wrote:

Except for when it's not the first definition. I mean if you want to use the Americanized slang and sound less intelligent by all means.

Ah. You threaten banning for insults yet you insult. Hypocritical but interesting. Do as you say not do as you do. Gotcha.

Learned Intelligence: Yes, if you take the definition literally as you do, "everyone would qualify" for the category. Except for the fact that anyone tagged as having "learned behavior" is tagged as such due to their Power Rating listing per the Marvel Handbook. Anyone with a level 3 intelligence falls in Marvel's category of having "Learned Behavior". As ADour explained to you (probably not slowly enough) it's based on the Official Marvel Handbook's definition of "Learned Intelligence". Really the issue here is that you can't interpret the context of the phrasing.

Yes and it's still an idiotic category that tells you nothing.

Dating: Just because it's constantly changing and I find that it trivial doesn't mean we're scrapping it. It's a valid query provided people keep the tags up to date.

It would make more sense to just put up a category for characters who have dated so and so character. But I guess you would find a problem with that too.

Adventurers: Again, if you're going to heavily generalize what every hero does they could be classified as an adventurer. However not everyone fits the definition. So again why do you have your hair up your ass about this other than you personally don't like it?

I have less of a bug about that particular one than the others.

O*N*E Threat Levels: They're quantified in the comics. If you have a hard time trying to comprehend them that doesn't make their inclusion here invalid.

Then every SINGLE article that uses that category should have a reference tag that cites said reference. The O*N*E* level categories are complete cruft and should be scrapped.

THESE are the categories I have a bug in my butt just for clarification.

Master of all forms of combat: Ah, I see your tactic here, you're going to split hairs over obscure characters. If your argument for the invalidity of these categories is going to be based on minor characters that really don't matter overly much that's not a valid argument. That said, it's Marvel's definition of that fighting skill, if their handbook entry gives them a certain level of fighting skills, that's what we're going to tag people with. Also your position is that "if they haven't been seen doing it, they can't do it" attitude. Which, sorry to burst your bubble, but whose to say a writer won't come along and suddenly say Jake Gallows is a master of mental combat. I don't see how that's impossible. The guy has all sorts of technology implanted in his brain. Just because he doesn't have mental powers does not mean he cannot defend himself against mental attack. One of strong mental will can fend off mental invaders.

Now that all said, if anything is crap it's your attitude. So how about you focus on something worthwhile and let us admins worry about what categories are valid and what ones are not. Which by the way, you're the only person complaining about it.

Also, if you use the word "retarded" in that context again I'll block you from commenting anywhere on the Wiki. That term is pejorative to people with physical or mental disabilities (Like using the word dumb, or dumber, because of the original definition). Obfuscating the point I brought up by accusing me of obfuscating the point? Wow. I notice you completely failed to tell me what makes the people in the category qualify for being in that category. You just responded with snark because you don't have an argument.

I didn't call your retarded. I said your argument was retarded. I don't think you're retarded. I think your dumb. That said your inability to comprehend the distinction points to the fact that you may be retarded. I wouldn't call you a retard but I would suggest you get tested.