Thread:DaNASCAT/@comment-1713281-20140530170016/@comment-1618941-20140602121928

Ah, I see. I'm not sure of how the syntax works in those modules, so the following observations might be off, but if I understand them correctly, there may be some errors.

Occupations are probably fine, but... ["sorcer"] = {"Magicians"},

The Character template uses the partial word to categorise into "magicians" if the input data on the article includes those letters in that sequence, so both "sorcerer" and "sorceress" get from the presence of the partial word. This still works the same, right? Or should we use two lines (accounting for both genders) in the module with complete words?

Additionally, Module:CharacterInfoboxUnusualFeatures could have a few small bugs...

["fur"] = {"Fur"}, ["furrow"] = {"Fur"}, ["furrowed chin"] = {"Furrowed chin"},

On the Character template "furrow" is in the "fur" line to exclude characters with furrowed chins from being categorised as having fur.

Further down that module "allowing" is in, although this was redundant in the Character template as its presence was covered by "owing" on the next line. As with the furrowed chin issue, this was to prevent characters with "glowing" eyes, or "flowing" mane etc. being categorised as having wings (because letters spelling "wing" are present in "owing").

Hope that all makes sense... :D