Thread:Tycio/@comment-1713281-20120413040459/@comment-5136084-20120416234005

The two from IWC... were actual panel cut-outs and required no cropping since Molly's fully clothed in them. I and of themselves I don't believe they had any 'function to excite'.

Your objection about crediting authors for cropped work makes sense but in that case, would it mean if someone contributed clean fan-art to a wiki but had done erotic works elsewhere (on sites appropriate for it) that they'd be banned from the Wikia project?

Or for that matter, using your example, having written the "smut in the UK" Lost Girls work, is it wrong to recommend Alan Moore's work in Marvel in case it leads people to read his erotic works in DC?

Speaking of the whole '"main function to excite sexuality" thing, it seems to be a subjective interpretation, since don't we often see prudes criticize certain female attires using similar phrasing?