Thread:Pkrll/@comment-22439-20140211111809/@comment-3406131-20140211172303

Yep, it's simple. On the wikia, we use an "in-universe" perspective (while keeping on an encyclopedic scripture). We write as if we were on the universe of the character.

For example, concerning Charles Xavier, his history text introduction won't be: "Charles Xavier is a mutant character created by Stan Lee and featured for the very first time in X-Men #1. He is the leader of the X-Men."

But: "Charles Xavier is a mutant, teacher and leader of the X-Men.

(If leave the ref working, it look like this: "Charles Xavier is a mutant, teacher and leader of the X-Men.

There is no Earth-1218 (our reality) information to appear on the page, except in a few exception: The creators and first and death appearances are in the infobox (along the names, the affiliations, etc), the ref (as I have showed you before), and some thing in the notes and trivia, if they can't be translating in in-universe text.

In the same way, the events have to be named regarding to the in-universe rule. That's why I tried to prevent myself from writing AvX or Avengers vs. X-Men, but turn it in phrases who have the same meaning (The Fear, The Attack of the Serpent instead of Fear Itself, for example). Some events and story line can be named as in our universe because they are named the same in the comics universe (ex: Decimation, Civil War). (personnaly, in this story arc, I've used the title "Rapture" on Omega Black's page to describe the events of Uncanny Avengers, as that was the title of the issue.

That was the point critized in your edit: You've put "Ragnarak NOW", put the "now" is an editorial thing, from our universe, and Ragnarok isn't maybe the good term to use if it hasn't been used in-universe, and even, maybe not appropriate.

If you have other questions..