Thread:Antvasima/@comment-24503208-20180310041444/@comment-24503208-20180313124602

Webcamparrot: Yet, whenever I see anyone else do so. Ant uses appeal to authority and says "Oh, well this person doesn't agree with this so this shouldn't be used" and whenever he gets disproven he closes a topic. So, yeah, we all know that doesn't work.

Ant, we both know you use other people's own "agreements" to justify if a calc or a feat should or should not be used, and whenever you get disproven, you decide to close the topic because you are unable to back up your points. I've seen you do that against SEVERAL people. I will present my evidence as long as you don't close the topic or try to nitpick or get upset at me spitting hard facts. Or, if you're going to abuse your mod powers and CANNOT back up your reasoning as to why a character should not be revised, then any of you are welcome to debate me on Discord where your powers are null, and all that you'll have is your own debating etiquette.

Trust me, this site gets enough criticizing as it gets. I am merely trying to fix that. It will only get worse because people will know the people who maintain this site can't even pass through an entire debate or are unwilling to back up their points.

So, if I bring up my counterarguments, maybe you should not abuse your mod powers or use appeal from authority or popularity. Fallacies have no place in revisions.If you can manage that, then we can have a respectable discussion. Capisce?

All from the guy admin Dragon point out.

Not only that sounds like blackmail, but now I am pissed off.