Thread:ADour/@comment-26991858-20151008135844/@comment-3406131-20151008193358

Here some answers from me and AnnabellRice.

To answer your questions: CountAbyss77 wrote: Why delete the category of bad characters?is very important the alignment. No, it was useless, subjective, it led to pointless arguments, it had no official basis, and it's a matter of philosophy and personal opinions.

CountAbyss77 wrote: What???seriously it is a good decision????.now is not known who is good and who is evil and I aapplaud this community and his ideas.and because you do not bother you so mess you left the alignment.Now explain to me if you do not know the character as who is good and who is bad You read the comics and you make an opinion by yourself.

CountAbyss77 wrote: at least the return of bad characters to differentiate is esencial for know the characters.this categorie is the most important in the character Your two points are wrong:
 * There is no point in adding back only the "bad characters" category, because bad is something opposed to something else.
 * It's maybe the least important category. I tend to have waaaaay more interest in the species or the power level of a character (based on comics material, not subjective point of view). Again that's subjective. As is the subject of that category.