Thread:Undoniel/@comment-3406131-20170302214506/@comment-10473115-20170311003015

Sorry, but I can't stop seeing what I see and it's hard for me to know which policies are long-forgotten. Opinions with those differ and we should ask from the community before jumping to conclusions. For example, we don't have many disambiguation pages for real names, most are for aliases so it's hard to deem that changed by the convention. the linked titles are useful because they allow the user to navigate from a page to a page to its disambiguation easily. Link to disambiguation is useful but it don't have to be a title. I already proposed to move the link to the current alias. If the title is a real name, it should be linked manually from its field. There would an inconsistency between the main names (titles, current alias, real name) without links and the aliases with links. I don't understand, alias field don't create any auto-links. Why we had to remove manually added links? Besides, I think that only useful links should be created and consistency has nothing to do with it.
 * not confusing for the users (really confusing)
 * allowing an easy navigation for the users (meaning going from a page to its disambiguation page(s) with a click, less scrolling possible, etc.)
 * uniform in order to keep consistency To address all those problems, what about removing all links from the infobox and adding a hatnote for character's alias: This page is about Earth-616 Wolverine, for other universes, see Wolverine

Again, I feel that we are talking past each other. I would really appreciate if someone else could participate in the discussion to help us.