Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20170415164119/@comment-10473115-20170417152138

What do you mean by putting up a fight as in opposed to participating in a discussion? I've only seen debates between editors with different opinions. Sometimes those have continued over their usefulness because arguments have been the same without resulting a consensus. Those discussions should have been put under a voting. Still, there have always been at least two sides of the debate.

There have been proposals to merge some stub articles to another page, restricting the listing of appearances and restrictions to categorizing. That kind of things have been always been done in this wiki. I haven't seen any proposals to delete written article text. We may have different opinions for the threshold of these things but I've given an explanation for my opinion on every discussion I have participated. Could you give more specific explanation which kind of behaviour is creating this feeling about false arguments and ill will.

I don't think that I misunderstood your opinion about the responsibility of the staff. We just have different opinions. Users can edit policy pages with or without any special user rights. If I wanted to lessen my bad conscience about not getting enough done by stepping down from admin position, I would be just as good to write policies as today. Responsibility should be shared amongst everyone interested. Wiki editing is based on voluntary acts and I don't want to give any more pressure to staff members than there's already. I understand your point of view and in small wikis it's a reality without an option.