Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161213202224/@comment-16461120-20161213221223

Villains
I'm in favor of renaming this "Antagonists."

Flashbacks/Flashforwards
I prefer the "Continuity Notes" option.

Appearances in Recaps
I support the creation of appearances and believe they should be coded as a "Minor Appearance". (See my Eliminating "False" Appearances comments.)

Mentions
I agree in principle; however, there are legitimate reasons to include them elsewhere from time to time, like if the Antagonists are Hydra and in addition to those actually appearing they repeatedly mention a specific leader, or if the Supporting Characters are S.H.I.E.L.D. and the agents mention the Director, Captain America, and Quake. (In other words, there are times when keeping a team grouped together makes more sense than listing a team twice.)

Eliminating "False" Appearances
Okay, this comes up every time we discuss this, so I guess I'll mention it again... is absolutely, positively, 100%  not  categorized the same as

That being said, I endorse the creation of "Minor Appearances" categorization, as discussed here, to address this issue and oppose the idea of coding these in any manner which categorizes them as nothing at all and thus renders them virtually useless for potential research.

Long Tags/Removing Clutter in Appearances
Using the green tag in this manner wouldn't be necessary if the aforementioned "Minor Appearances" proposal were implemented and includes an overhaul of the green text generated by each related tag.

Clear Definitions for Appearance Section
Clarifying instructions is always good.