Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-4651179-20160212025606/@comment-10473115-20160213113115

I agree with Shabook's proposition since there's no logic to differentiate the appearances by how many members are representing a race. We have discussed before about using word race and its possible negative connotations but I don't see those at least as a non-native speaker.

Shabook has proposed that we list human race appearances if there are other races involved. That could be helpful sometimes but I think that we could omit human appearances altogether. But I don't have any strong opinions about that and even categorizing every human appearance would be okay for me. We just should mention how human appearances are categorized on their appearances category page and be consistent with it. However, example of using planet Earth isn't valid because its usage is based about nesting locations not getting appearances right.

I don't think that we need different appearance category based on major or minor appearances. It feels too complicated. But we have to decide how to handle hybrids with multiple races. Should we categorize hybrid's every race or none at all?

AnnabellRice wrote: would we be listing New Attilan's Inhumans and the Inhumans Race in multiple sections? Don't they all go to Category:Inhumans (Inhomo supremis)/Appearances. We don't categorize appearances by nationality.