Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161026191028/@comment-3406131-20171224012420

Shabook wrote: Quick doubt: Is the category Aliens appliable only for extraterrestrial beings whose race is unknown? Or can also be applied to extradimensional beings? I had considered that some categories (but I confess there is a lack of consistency), and particularly "aliens", should include only those whose races isn't known (the "identified" aliens being presented in "races of aliens").

By the same logic, I always try to regroup characters on the lowest/"more-accurate" level possible: Removing "" in favor of more accurate categories avoid having listed in the same group Neanderthals, Neos, Sapiens and Eternals (not that that category was used to list all humans, but by some logic, it should have been, now it only list the "species of humanity" categories, in which are listed the individuals of each type.

Developing rules to enforce consistency and homogeneity (to the extent of relevancy) would be a good idea. For example, I listed the Category:Fallen Angels (angels deprived of status, mostly demons) separated from the Category:Angels (Monotheism) (current angels). Some identified angels are demons (listed in Category:Angels degenerated into Demons) while other are in middle ground (the Grigori are both Angels and Fallen Angels, given their depiction). To be sure to list everything for everyone, I created Category:Angels of Heaven (Full Listing), who list fallen angels, angels, possible angels, as it serves both as a full listing for readers and for editors. Same could be done for aliens.

But like I said: there not much consistency in how I work on this question, it's mostly subjective relevancy, and ways to retrieve information the easily way possible.

Shabook wrote: Also, can the red link in the post above be fixed? Which red link?