Thread:Shabook/@comment-29730903-20170730174427

I did read through the rules. The parameters for the 3RR apply to everything, meaning nobody should make more than three reverts on a page within 72 hours, unless they're:
 * Reverting your own changes (Self-reverts)
 * Correction of simple vandalism
 * Removing posts made by a banned or blocked user
 * Rearranging contents inside a page

None of those users were doing any of those things, according to your definitions of vandalism. It turns out, however, my edits are to be considered "Good Faith Edits". In other words, a sincere attempt to improve the wiki, no matter how misguided. I still believe my edits to be accurate and true, and if you were to look through the logs, you'd see that I was only removing information I believe to be incorrect, which is the third item listed under the "good faith edits" policy section on that page.

Furthermore, I read through the "Blocking Policy". It only applies to vandalism and bad faith edits, posting spam links or creating spam articles, moving pages to other pages with inappropriate names, users who make misleading (though it doesn't specify misguided, and all the information I put down is true: Civil War is 2017, Homecoming is 2017, Iron Man is an active Avenger in Homecoming, Uncle Ben was never mentioned in the movie, there's no confirmation to the extent to which he exists) edits, or harassing other users (which other users were doing to me: http://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:205774#8), and other things that do not apply to this situation.

Technically, I have no "reason" to have been banned, as I didn't break any rules in the |Blocking Policy, | all my edits were in good faith, and I'm not the only one who was "edit-warring", and I did stop first, far before I was banned, and I was willing to discuss it with other users on talk pages. The other users kept on edit warring. Murali's contributions are definitely within the parameters of edit-warring. If the issue was edit-warring, I don't see why he doesn't get a ban as well, or seeing as I stopped and he showed no sign of being willing to, I don't see why I even have to be banned. I'm familiar with the rules now and by the time I was banned, my only violation of the wiki's rules was edit-warring, not the content of my edits, which were in good faith, and one other user was found in violation of this. |See here.]

I'm willing to continue discussing it on talk pages, as I was prior to my banning, but I clearly have no intentions of continued edit warring. It's obvious, seeing as |my last 16 contributions, which spanned over the course of nearly four hours] are merely talk page and thread edits, that I didn't plan on editing the page any further without finding a middle ground with everyone else, which is not a punishable offense.

Anyways, I read and am now familiar with the rules, and I see no reason why I should be banned, or why Murali isn't banned with me. 