Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161026191028/@comment-1713281-20180627224040

I know I don't really get involving in policy discussions these days, but I'm gonna grandfather in an opinion that I've stuck with for as long as we've been having these naming convention debates: Changing naming conventions for the sake of ease is a poor idea, and we've dedicated far too much time as an admin team arguing against that sentiment over the years.

I could rehash all of talking points from all these past decisions, but I think we could just take the simple route here and have Nathan take a look at the offending template and see if we can figure out were the issue is. We don't need to alter our naming conventions, and create a bunch of work renaming articles, when we can fix the template that seems to have done it's job for 10 years now.