Thread:ADour/@comment-3406131-20181022201324

Hi!

I wanted to discuss with you about your recent message here.

While I understand the problem about creating event pages for some minor events where it could not be worth, I have some reserves on the rest of the message:
 * Given that Marvel adds material to those events (including contradictory origins, Tunguska Event being the best example with 6 concurrent or superposed origins), they ARE relevant to the Marvel Universe, because they do occur within it and often with their own details, and there's nothing unnecessary in creating such events, as long as there are indeed references (cf. Julius Caesar (Earth-616), which is a special case in which most of the mentions aren't Marvel's additional stories but serves as a framework for Marvel stories). It might seem trivia information for some, but as a Wikia, there's nothing wrong with it, at the contrary.
 * On the other side, I opposed (but was outvoted IIRC on the additions of categories and information unmentioned (as far) in-universe but existent on Earth-1218, such as Stephen Hawking (Earth-616) for literally almost everything on his page). In such cases, there is no relevancy or use for what is added, because we don't know at what extent it can apply to the character even if we can assume they are the same.
 * I'm more mixed on the question of events within events: On one hand, I agree that the bombings should be included within WWII, but wouldn't the treatment of alternate versions of a "sub-event" lose in consistency in doing so? In such cases, I tend to prefer a small paragraph with a very visible link to the relevant page (like the Aesir/Vanir War in the Vanir (Gods)'s history page). Seems to me it should handled case-by-case (that question is somewhat related, if you missed it).

Have a good day/night in the meantime. 