Thread:AI 293943/@comment-26704056-20151006202125/@comment-3406131-20151007065212

AI 293943 wrote: So he's neutral? This is exactly why we need the alignments issued and listed. Actually, this is exactly why alignments are irrelevant, inaccurate, and in most of the cases, subjective and inapplicable. Therefor useless. We're not children, the world isn't black and white.

If I list some characters like Iron Man, Cap or Wolverine, or Spider-Man, Cyclops, Bruce Banner, Xavier, Toad, Dr. Doom or the Punisher, all of them could be listed from good to neutral most of the time, and even bad at some point (murders, manipulation, "terrorism").

Each time, and according to the lecture of different people, those characters can be good/bad/neutral, and nobody is really right, because those characters are most complex than simply defined by an alignment.
 * The Punisher is a cold-blooded assassin/The Punisher is the justice/The Punisher is a soldier lost in a war against crime
 * Dr. Doom is a threat to the world/Dr. Doom is the kind (depending on the author) ruler of Latveria/Dr. Doom is just a big ego who needs a direction (like when he was along the Future Foundation)
 * Cyclops is a terrorist with a Phoenix egg/Cyclops was right/Cyclops takes extreme measures to protect people
 * And I could go on...