Thread:Monolith616/@comment-10473115-20170303000811/@comment-16461120-20170308004039

Shabook wrote: Mrkermit wrote: You both brought up the frustration about non-resolved discussions and there's not much I can say to that. I've felt the same way all the time I've been editing here. That's why I've always tried to increase the discussion. Although, I did consider agent naming issue resolved, somebody should just write it to the policy. Honorifics are little more difficult as we can't even decide do we have a consensus already and who should be allowed to participate. I think maybe I have a comment or two to make on the agents issue, not to revive, but to point a few things I saw while researching for the matter, but first I'd like to see the Misters matter closed. I think that after two months since the thread started, and two votes, it should be settled.

Could we close it and move on, please? I was protesting the idea that a second vote was even necessary there, but have caved if it helps to establish the situation as finally resolved.