Thread:WarBlade/@comment-5164970-20140629072154/@comment-1618941-20140629101615

There was a little bit of discussion about this on the talk page a while back, where I almost made a rough outline, or design brief, for the way I structured it when I put together the start of the history text in its current form.

Just to quote myself, a couple of points I made back then:
 * ''"The more I think about it, the more I feel that the solution is to simply 'zoom out'. The article needs to de-focus from the fiddly details of each movie and just summarise each one in one or two paragraphs."
 * ''"I was loosely aiming for one paragraph per movie, although the S.H.I.E.L.D subplot needed to carve out a bit of its own, as did the early years."

I'll say this of your edit: I like it more than those of the previous contributor. Good call on scrapping the Peter Quill bit, dunno about Killian - that was the start point of something significant, but the paragraph was too bloated too, so it needed a fix anyway.

I don't like the mash-up of Extremis and Coulson's team. Those should be separate I think, and Coulson's story had more to do with Fury's suspicions about SHIELD than the revival of Extremis with Centipede. Where I think that paragraph really fails though is the previous contributor named the agents of Coulson's team, and I think this zooms in (if you'll excuse my earlier analogy) a little too far. The style of the article has been to cover significant people sparingly from a world stage perspective. This world knows who Stark is, and Erskine has gone down in history, but Fitz and Simmons?

Is that what you were after? :D