User blog comment:Blinkn/Cyclops and his kids?/@comment-3012197-20110731164829

Hmm interesting questions. I think one of Scott's biggest problems is that he grew up believing he was an orphan. He never had a father figure (until his late teens when he met Xavier) so he doesn't really know how to be a good father.

Cable is the best example of this. Like you said Scott abandoned him as a child, and then later launched him into the future, so they have no real bonding time. True Scott didn't seem upset about Cable's death, but Kurt died at the same time and Scott didn't seem to shaken up about that either. I think it's a combination of him being a strong leader and just a generally cold individual.

As for Rachel I think she is most attached because she was the only one of the three that was actually raised by Scott and Jean for any significant amount of time. Also she is a girl and would hold relationships with her mother and father more dear than a boy might. It seems pretty natural that she would be upset with Scott and Emma getting together. Anyone would be upset if their dad started dating someone else, especially an x-con like Emma.

Nate Grey, I don't know a whole lot about, but i do know that he is not Scott's son in the traditional sence. Sinister just used part of Scott's DNA to make Nate. How attached can you be to someone if you are just the alternate reality version of their sperm donor?