Board Thread:Movies/@comment-4651179-20140124221431/@comment-1895174-20140701221846

Hulkophile wrote: This isn't going to be a found footage film. No one ever said it would be found footage, the quote that LoveWaffle posted didn't say "it's going to be a found footage film". It was more like, "it's going to have the same tone as Chronicle". That's actually what it said. The quote was in direct response to Chronicle's found-footage aesthetic. Nausiated wrote: Hey guys! Here's a novel idea: Instead of complaining about something that won't be released for another year how about you just wait until it comes out before you start making bold statements about it"ruining" something. Here's a novel idea: Instead of composing a diatribe on how people have opinions that are not yours, turn the other way. Ignore it. Don't give it any attention. Just don't give a hot fart. Listen to the soundtrack from Frozen. After all, why should someone else firing a missive off into the void matter to you?

You are really grumpy for a guy complaining about people being grumpy. Nausiated wrote: And could it hurt the lot of you to be a little more constructive whenever something new comes out? I swear, the amount of belly aching I see in these forums whenever something new and different is going to be released gets tiring. Here's some constructive criticism: Although I don't see how much that'll change anything. I doubt anyone involved with it will ever read this, and even if they do I doubt they'll put any serious consideration into the opinions of just one internet neckbeard. Nausiated wrote: And hey, another concept: If you don't think you'll like the new FF movie, don't watch it. That's a cop out and you know it. A bad movie, especially one like this, can mean more than just not being entertaining. Fans of Green Lantern have the terrible Ryan Reynolds movie to blame for there being no more chance for a solo Green Lantern movie. I want a good Fantastic Four reboot because I'd like to see even more good Fantastic Four movies. I don't want a bad Fantastic Four movie because...well, how's that Green Lantern sequel turning out? Nausiated wrote: Then follow that by not expending energy on writing negative things on it, because it's a waste of everyone's time. I know that's a mind blowing concept for some, but try it out, you'll be a lot more mellow in life when you stop taking these sort of things so seriously. If that's what you truly believe, I would recommend you try it out for yourself sometime.
 * Instead of following the Ultimate Fantastic Four as a source, go with the classic, beloved Silver Age stories.
 * Instead of using a tired found-footage aesthetic, don't.
 * Instead of tying the Fantastic Four to the X-Men films, use the Fantastic Four as a launching off point for bigger superhero movie plans. The Fantastic Four shouldn't need to ride the coattails of the X-Men films to be be successful.
 * Instead of wasting a budget on a Fantastic Four movie, why not agree to return the rights to the Fantastic Four property to Marvel Studios in return for some monetary compensation? Or strike a distribution deal with them like Universal did for the Hulk property. They really want it, and you've got them over a barrel if they want to get it back.
 * Instead of putting the time into writing a tirade that amounts to "Why don't people like what I like!", watch some cat videos on Youtube. They're adorable.

If you don't like what other people are saying about the Fantastic Four reboot, you don't have to read it. Then follow that up by not expending the energy on writing a diatribe on how people's opinions are bad and should feel bad, because it's a waste of everyone's time (including your own). I know that might be a mind-blowing concept to you, but try it out, you'll be a lot more relaxed if you stop worrying so much about other people's opinions.

And if you are going to write something up, could it hurt to be a little more constructive? I swear, the amount of bellyaching I see out of you whenever someone expresses an opinion is just going to get tiring.