Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-4651179-20130114214441/@comment-4651179-20130116035739

What about expanding the "It doesn't make sense..." to its real lenght?

"''Yes, this is an encyclopedia, an online encyclopedia in a modern world. Encyclopedias must be up-to-date, reason why "Otto Ocatvius (Earth-616)" must have a Spider-Man profile image, because he's now Spider-Man. And as far as I know it would help people who are trying to know more about "Doc Ock is now Spider-Man? I want to know moooreee!". It doesn't make sense to leave the main image as the only thing not up-to-date. Why wouldn't a pic of Doc Ock mislead them thinking "so... Doc Ock is not Spider-Man now?" after all, I don't think that someone would turn away immediately after seeing the Spider-Man picture, they know how to read the rest of the page.''"

Meh, giving a fragment of a text without context in order to support a wrong argument, reminds me of Iron Man 2's scene in the Capitol.

Where I give an actual explanation on why that argument doesn't make sense instead of yours "it doesn't make any sense" floating in the air.

I could say that you are harassing me, you're clearly putting in doubt my position as an administrator just because you can't handle your truth when it is said to you. As a student would say to a teacher "you can do nothing because you can be fired". That doesn't seem to be the perfect attitude.

You seem to think that because I'm an admin I have to be like a chained dog and go all "mister nice" with you, I'll make it clear, an admin or not, my position won't prevent me for giving my honest point of view with who I think it should be get it, specially someone with a clearly provocative attitude, which includes mocking an user, am I right Mr. "total and unacceptable inconsistency"?, pointing out an "immature attitude" with no reason (as the argument which "proved" me immature was proved wrong).