Thread:Wazzirving/@comment-61371-20120303161509/@comment-2051886-20120305223459

ok, so I'm just trying to ease the waves here a little. I guess you could say I agreed to the split into three pages, although as Brad pointed out, all I was trying to achieve was not having duplicate information on the different pages. However, it is also true that no one else voiced opposition to the idea. Me neither, so if anyone has to apologize, it's me.

Now that I think about it, I'm really not sure we need all three. I very much disagree about not needing pages for the Age of X cast - yes, possibly in a decade or so, we will remember this timeline as a simple hiccup, but considering how different its inhabitants were from their 616 counterparts, it makes sense. And that would probably be the strongest argument for having only two Rachel pages: Mother Askani was very different from Rachel's other incarnations in the sense that her character was noticeably different: she was older, wiser, a little more on the depressed side - the orgiginal Rachel and the "new" Rachel from that perspective have no differences as far as I can tell. Seems to me more of a case of "resurrection" than a case of new character. And on that note: Imagine we'd do a new page for each incarnation of Jean Grey - we could do our own wiki on that, probably. And wazz: you just made a very strong point against three pages: "If they changed their names and/or think they were someone else, that grants a new page." Rachel hasn't changed her name and has never considered herself to be a separate entity from her older self.--edkaufman (talk) 07:03, March 5, 2012 (UTC)