Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20160326125713/@comment-61022-20160414140202

Yeah I think there should be a large amount of qualifiers for a vote as a control on decision making.

I'm going to be brutally honest but there are a lot of users on here that either come here and use the Wiki as a message board and contribute nothing, do nothing but update things that I find trivial (adding endless categories), or are just lacking in skill or knowledge. One thing that we have to consider is that because the nature of the material we cover has a general appeal and a large age range, we're may also be dealing with young people who -- and I said I was going to be brutally honest -- don't have the mental maturity or the long term reading history that would constitute an informed vote.

I think that when it comes to voting, they have to have been a member of the Wiki for over a year, have made over 500 edits of good quality (which will be vetted by admins or mods)

But before we get into this, I think we need to do a thorough review of our policies and updated them.