Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20160218162200/@comment-10473115-20160302215912

Thanks for all the replies. It's good to know that page title shouldn't affect too much for SEO. Although, in my tests with Google it really seemed to have at least somewhat significance. And hint to use search terms at the start of an article is a good one, we really should have some kind of lead section to help the readers.

AnnabellRice wrote: don't become out-of-date every time a character changes their current alias. You have misunderstood what's the most known title. Article name wouldn't change with code name change because new one wouldn't be most known.

I see that the majority wants to retain Earth-616 and use most well known real name in the page titles. I still disagree because uniformity shouldn't be most important thing in encyclopedic writing, article about Bono should be found under B and not as Paul David Hewson. Articles about kings and popes should be named after their "alias". And I also hate that we have to use piped link for characters every time.

But if I've understood correctly, we drop that different naming policy for clones and use Ben Reilly (Earth-616) instead of Peter Parker (Ben Reilly) (Earth-616). Also we would change Susan Storm (Earth-616) to Susan Richards (Earth-616) and Spider-Man (Peter Parker) to Peter Parker (Earth-616).