Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161124005352/@comment-1894786-20161201043027

The Many-Angled One wrote: Sorry but I have to disagree with you here. While I agree that in some cases we can deal with it differently, tagging like this (in this specific case) isn't unnecessary. You can't just classify that as "unnecessary" or "ugly" just because you don't like it (actually, you can, but... whatever). The way you suggested to tag it that is unnecessary, because: a) different from, doesn't follow two narratives in two different points in time; b) the flashbacks here are used to add up to the main story by shedding new light into some specific events that we already saw in the previous Ultimates series and in Civil War II; and c) there's just only one page dedicated to show a glimpse of what's coming in the next issues of the series, giving it its own section separated from the others is just too exaggerated.

About the problem of finding the page for this specific series, just search for Ultimates Squared and you'll find it. Piggy-backing off of this issue, it would be great if there was a page where all the tags' codes are listed for new/amateur editors such as myself. I recall seeing a tag that labeled a character as "mentioned deceased" but I've never been able to find the code for it, so whenever I have a character like that, I put down "mentioned" and "deceased" separately. And then there are some where I don't know if a tag exists for it (like "in character's imagination") and I have to settle for the next best thing (like "appears in an illusion or vision").

And while it's ugly, the tags do provide the most accurate information about a character's appearances in an issue. So I'm firmly for it.