Thread:Antvasima/@comment-5537483-20140802175052/@comment-5537483-20140802200247

Different viewpoints is not what I am critising. I am critising the sheer arbitrariness you use to form these *viewpoints*. You can't just say that statement A is purely boasting and Statement B is valid, when both isn't backed up by actual feats. You can't just discredit Jim Starlin in one second and use one of his statements as the absolute gospel of truth in the other. You can't just say that the original interpretations from certain characters of only Lee and Kirby are valid and then outright ignoring them (f.e. Galactus being a neutral force) just because you don't like certain characters. Either use your arguments consistenlty or don't use them, but don't just cherrypick partial things that suit you and neglect others when you don't like them. Because this is nothing but reaching.

And yes, I'm even willing to grant you right in my last edits that I should have used references, which I will now correct. And hopefully you won't just change them again because you don't like it. I'm willing to accept critic. Try some of it too.