Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-61022-20170213225824/@comment-1895174-20170213231841

Wait, so mentions are last again? I was told awhile ago to stop doing that.

Ahhh...it's frustrating!

Anyway, I've already started manually swapping out "Villains" for "Antagonists." That being said, I find this questionable:

Mentions: I don't think I need to tell anyone that why someone who is only mentioned in a story is never an antagonist. If they do not appear in a story then they are not opposing the protagonist and therefor are not the antagonist of the story. So please STOP PUTTING MENTIONS IN THE ANTAGONIST FIELD. This is one I have

I think it's entirely possible for a character to be an antagonist and not physically appear if their actions are done through henchmen and other underlings. It's a rare exception, but an entirely plausible one.