User blog comment:ADour/Some CRITICISM against criticism against Iron Man 3/@comment-24308873-20130928205806/@comment-4651179-20130930013201

You believe his fire-breath is a concentrated blast, but it certainly doesn't look like it. All of your argument is based on speculation, that it's a concentrated blast and that it should be one of his most powerful moves, while mine and M(G)P's are not.

I don't understand the reference, but you're certainly still wrong.

No, the only part the armor which was certainly damaged was the leg and part of the torso. The parts farther from the fire if it would've been breathed. And that his armor was too damaged is still a poor excuse, his head and chest were still practically intact. Plus, the other point I mentioned, why would he have used his fire-breath if he used instead a more powerful attack?

I also find it offensive, that's why I expressed that's what the Internet likes to say it, not me. And, yes, I have been in fights, 1.5 seconds is not that long time, "brah", you should also watch the video again, as soon as he lands on Tony, he throws the punch. Not to mention he used a more powerful attack instead.

I thought when you said Killian had 3 moments to use his fire breath were going to be actual barely good moments to use it. Maybe moments when he actually could've used it, or moments when he wasn't about to use a more powerful and effective attack. But the moments you gave are stupid, plain and simple.

No, I'm basing his fire breath's damage on facts, not especulation, the temperature of a current of fire can be perfectly estimated by its color.

So before saying my logic is moronic for the sake of what you think is a clever retaliation, think and prevent yourself from continue digging your own grave even deeper.