Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1713281-20140523065821/@comment-1895174-20140603015100

Let's go over every inane thing you just said. You know that he wasn't suggesting that every single event in X2 happened. That's actually exactly what he said. And you also know that if he was, he most likely forgot about Jean's death Hence my response to his comment. (because it's impossible for all of the events of X2 to have happened, but it's quite possible that most of it did - which is what he was suggesting) Actually, he was suggesting that X2 and X-Men happened. That's why he said "X-Men and X2 happened" and not "most of the events of the movies probably maybe happened."

If he did mean that, then maybe he shouldn't have said "X-Men and X2 happened." I won't exclude the possibility of poor choice of words. and doesn't need telling twice that "technically" X2 didn't happen. Didn't tell him twice. Said it once. Hence the start of this discussion. And I didn't need telling, because I wasn't implying that all of X2 happened either. But you did defend that assertion. So, wouldn't that make you a contrarian? Nah, I would rather know what the points are before deciding to jump in in disagreement.

Can you please go back to editing or something? I find these exercises in arguing with a bullheaded contrarian very tiring.