Thread:AnnabellRice/@comment-36038563-20190419221933/@comment-16461120-20190420071642

Mostly just explaining my thought process here, since your question seemed to be how we might tell for sure...


 * That site claims it was published on the 28th of August 2015, and the subsection in question wasn't part of our article at that time, so it does indeed appear to most likely be plagiarism.


 * From there I jumped to the end of 2016 and it still wasn't part of our article, but by the end of 2017 it was, which narrowed my search to 2017 edits only. After that I checked the last edit in June, still not there, so it must be in the second half of 2017.


 * At this point I began looking for specific suspects, and User:Pythor37 is unfortunately a known plagiarist, so I focused in on his edits and found it here.

Anyway, I went ahead and just deleted all his work from that time period. It's better to have someone else add it in their own words than to try and "fix" someone else's plagiarism.