Thread:AnnabellRice/@comment-31466663-20170325103444/@comment-3406131-20170329201523

I'm sure you can try to discuss without sounding like a jerk. And I'm pretty sure your contribution to the wikia would be a lot more appreciated if you did.

So to be clear:
 * No need for cursing, so do not curse
 * Be polite and civil towards other users, because that's the way the things go here (and because other users are polite and civil towards you)

If you just don't want to use the handbooks for the source of information they are, then we don't force you to edit here, and I'm sure there's a lot of other websites where you can contribute and where handbooks are mostly ignored, but here, we use them and that's not going to change.

So, a last time: AnnabellRice wrote: Your language and condescending tone imply that you're not particularly interested in being a constructive part of the community here, but [we're] really trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.

As I stated above, they've already previously explained to you that the terminology comes directly from Rogers' most recent handbook entry, thus to supersede that requires more recent citation properly referenced to specific issues.