Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170310003740/@comment-10473115-20170310143121


 * 1) No excluding policy: Both have advantages, chronological helps tracking down an appearance from the comic but ordering based on importance usually results a more logical list that's easier to understand. If we have to choose between those options, I prefer ordering by importance but not enough to make it as a strict policy. I would allow both and also alphabetically arranged. Nested groupings sort of mess up chronological listing anyway. And shouldn't this affect to all appearance sections, not just Other characters.
 * 2) Recap: I think that a missing appearance is more problematic that a false one. That's why it's not good to change categorization with a template. However, if most (not just majority) of the template uses are wrong based on our new policy, we could change the template used on articles with a bot. That would at least allow peer review through watchlists.