User blog comment:Mr. Xemnas/2 seperate marevl cinematic universe's?????/@comment-1895174-20130201050316/@comment-3317214-20130203234235

ADour,

1) Agreed. Look at Syndrome in the Incredibles.

2) "Edgier". Nailed it. But I think that if a majority of the movie was set at night, you would call it "darker".

3) I didn't see The Amazing Spider-Man in the cinema, because at the time, I was really angry that Sony was making it, and thinking that Spider-Man would never be included in the cinematic universe

4) I swear, it's all in the title. You expect Batman Begins to fit the pattern and belong with Batman and Batman Returns...

5) Man, you are piling on a lot of unnecessary hate for TDKR. It's like you're trying really hard to hate it. If you seriously can't understand why it was a good film, I'll tell you one of the biggest reasons right here: It has a brilliant story. What's more, to say that Nolan's Batman suffered is wrong. TDKR grossed more than TDK, and TDKR was well received critically. So, comercially and critically, TDKR did well, and "Nolan's Batman" is a highly acclaimed series with the inclusion of the third part. These are facts. So to say that TDKR was a bad movie is a completely opinionated view, and my opinion on said view is that it's false.