Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-13487566-20150713021841

Artful Dodger wrote: Which means that every issue that comes out every month, we have to review every character, look at their actions, decide whether they have been good or bad or neutral enough to keep their current alignment or change it.

Every character. Every comic. Every month.

That is way too much work, far too subjective, not needed, and a waste of time.

Isn't this a community wiki? I'm sure there HAS to be people who contribute something helpful especially with the countless articles on single issue book that are released every month. Not only that but the internet itself is a tool which can help in this regard with the growing popularity of reviews and comic news content. Plus, if there ever was a major alignment change Marvel will be sure to make that a cash-in advertisement.

(Again, not trying to be mean but..) Are you guys seriously really against the alignments because it's work? This isn't a job. It's volunteer work. Unless you put in some commitment this wiki will fail. What you just described can be easily justified in many ways that dont even require you buying the book and reading it. I can't tell you guys enough how helpful the wiki is for me and removing something useful in terms of information (Which is what a Wiki is for) is really weird.