Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3121860-20160621182145/@comment-11285291-20160718112856

AnnabellRice wrote: You don't have to agree with me, and it's a clear logical fallacy that reflects the weakness of your argument when you must resort to ad hominem attacks on another member's gender when attempting to debate, but the fact is, what I said is a point that MJ herself made in about the differences between the way the two of them view the strain their past relationship put on her. Oh my God I can't believe how naive some of the members (mostly admins) of this wiki can be. They take everything I say too negatively. I said your APPROACH was sort of feminazi, and I would've said that even if you were a dude. I don't see how that is an "ad hominem attack to one's gender".

Anyway, if the current comics are to be followed, then I would say MJ is a hypocrite for stating that as the reason for their separation and it is inconsistent to past events. Back then MJ was totally okay with Peter doing what he does, and was completely able to cope with it, as I have stated in my previous comment. So all of a sudden she feels neglected and that Peter didn't care for her feelings, it is very inconsistent and hypocritical. Not just that, her stating that with Stark everything is out in the open and siding with him totally contradicts the fact that Peter trying to make it "out in the open" was the very reason they were separated. Another thing is, even that WASN'T the main reason she left him for good, instead as of this: she no longer wanted to be a part of his life because she wanted to live a normal life without danger. What is she doing now? She suits up as Iron-Spider and fights a super villain.... so much for living a normal life. Again, I must bring back the topic of the writers' incompetence. In ASM #14 it makes it seem as if Pete's dishonesty and negligence is the reason they separated, which is utter nonsense. So either Dan Slott deliberately wants to show MJ as a hypocrite, OR he was too incompetent to recheck the characters' history, that also from a story which HE WROTE. So what can anybody learn from this situation about their relationship? From what I can gather, they want people like you to question the authenticity of their relationship, and the people who liked them together and want them back together to suck it up and forget about it. So tell me whether my reasoning is still faulty and feel free to give counter-arguments.

And if you find anything in this comment gender offensive, then that is totally unintentional.