Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170221234010/@comment-10473115-20170416213138

Undoniel wrote: There was no vote earlier, because we were discussing the subject, we weren't voting anything. I quote the opening post: "Anyway, feel free to ask questions and vote whether mentions should remain as a single grouping or split in the aforementioned fashion."

I voted based on that and can't understand why we can start a new voting with slightly modified proposal in the middle of the voting thread calling it a compromise. This "voting" has been declared three times on a notification thread to ensure that "the compromise" wins. I will honor the majority of the votes but am very displeased about the process to get there. Your desire to get a wanted result has made this thread as an example of the things to avoid in the policy voting thread.