Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170221234010/@comment-10473115-20170402020221

Only thing separating this "compromise" from the original proposition is to make a category as hidden. It doesn't address the main argument of the opposition that if a mention is too trivial it's better to leave out than create a category for it. Better compromise was proposed by Annabell by listing an invocation without categorizing. I have already accepted that and nobody else opposed it.

Dragging this on on well over a month, creating a new voting about the compromise, omitting all votes against the new category from voting summary, feels more like gamesmanship than consensus seeking. I wouldn't use this thread as an example of good decision making.