Thread:Undoniel/@comment-1618941-20140608113102/@comment-3406131-20140608203157

For example, the current list accepts "Mephitisoids" as a citizenship. This is like saying, "We are citizens of humans." What it should be doing is is allowing mephitisoid characters from Tryl'sart to have either Tryl'sart or the Shi'ar Galaxy defining their citizenship. Well, no, "Shi'ar Empire" rather than Shi'ar Galaxy, as they're all supposed to be the same. But I agree on listing planets rather than species, even if it's more work, but what about species who are clearly described and clearly part of the Shi'ar Empire but without planet named? And I don't think there is a real need to divide for species who correspond exactly to their citizenships, without exceptions within them, as it occurs a lot in Marvel.

Here's another messy entry: Grogarr (Earth-616). Citizenship could be changed to "Ankaran," and since this insect is the only one there's no point in having a new category for it. If Category:Sligs is necessary for some reason, a single character is better off manually categorised on the article. But frankly a category with only one entry in it is pointless. Well I considered that before, but now I prefer to have things categorized from the beginning, even on their own, as categories are often themselves subcategories.

I was thinking of that "location vs. species" citizenship dilemma with Groot: Maybe it's time to clear that Flora colossus is the species and Planet X the citizenship for both Flora Colossus and I-don't-know-their-name-anymore little creatures But again in this way, I would categorize Flora colossus (a species) under Planet X (a citizenship), not a matter of real exactitude, but to deliver an information, although both species represents also (as often in Marvel) their own society (citizenships).