Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-122657-20130529193009/@comment-122657-20130530153819

So it sounds like we have an even split on the general issue, but know where we stand on the specific page.

To me, that sounds like it needs to be evaluated, and possibly voted on on a case by case basis for those characters who meet this definition. Should we should go with the initial contributor's 'gut', but put it up to a vote upon someone having a difference in opinion? Or should all cases where the character is not obviously an alternate of the mainstream character always be put up for a vote? (We'd probably need a specific place for that to happen).