Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-3406131-20151109193335/@comment-3406131-20151110130022

Well, if I knew if and how to do it, my first idea would have a system of message poppup, possibly as an option granted to moderators and admins, to make impossible for an user to miss their messages in complete good faith.

I agree I'm not fond of that idea, who can be perceived as aggressive, but I have to recall it has to remain kind of an exception, for people we can't reach another way.

Also, I had not finished some sentences Undoniel wrote: Well, if we agree on the principle (notably the fact that idea must be kept under strict rules of application), let's work the format: I thought of something like this, but the more we refine those rule, the better they will be:
 * The block has to a classic one (allowing answers on the wall), or else it doesn't serve any purpose.
 * The block is relative to the regularity of contributions of the user (hour(s), day(s), week?) in order to be sure to catch his attention.
 * Two messages have to be left unresponded for the block to be put.
 * Except in a case of vandalism, widespreaded edits (who would need more time to be corrected), half-mute-edit-wars (when you argue with an user on a page, but he keeps redoing his edit without checking either the message you left with your edits or on his wall): One message.
 * As for other blocked, but never forget in this case, a message explaining the reason of the block, focusing on the fact it is not a punishment, but the only way left to interact
 * Regarding the reaction and answers, the block can be lifted immediately. In the cases the users aren't good-willing, it remains, until a contact and explanations can be properly made.

Other stuff for his to work better:
 * Message to the current users and forum posts reminding all of us of the basis of community work
 * Add to the (to-be-changed) welcome message to new users (it happens that many new users actually check those.