Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170221234010/@comment-3406131-20170315002841

Mrkermit wrote: Consensus on the thread has been clearly against a new category. I don't consider that making it a hidden changes original proposition enough to warrant a new voting. There's no consensus on that: We're discussing it right now. Annabell propose it, as do I (I had not repelled the possibility of a category before or after the layout add to the policy guidelines).

That's why we propose consensus proposals where the interests and views of everyone are served. A category useful to researchers (and also useful because it divide them from "true" mentions) but unseen to those who don't care about such elements.

Seems to me like a good compromise: Those who want and could use the categories (to make more efficient research on some articles) would be able to, those who don't see their usefulness would be able to simply don't care about it, without the evocations and invocations listed among the regular category (that they would use without that pollution of useless-to-them mentions).

AnnabellRice wrote: Mrkermit wrote: Although for me "I've been to Hell and saved my mother." sounds quite generic but is understandable on the context. Was paraphrasing the subplot in Infamous Iron Man recounting how Victor literally went to Hell to reclaim Cynthia's soul. I can see Mrkermit's reason to see the sentence too generic. Adding that example and recalling the reader that the sentence is literal should be enough.