Thread:AnnabellRice/@comment-37854037-20200211063403/@comment-4651179-20200211070612

You're referring to an edit disagreement that involves me, so I'm going to take the liberty to butt in to answer this. The specific sentence reads the following:

"On July 10th, 2030, the "Secret Crisis" begins, throwing Superman into a brawl across the universe with Thor himself... and a green behemoth stronger than even Doomsday, who dies protecting Superman from these invaders."

There are four subjects in the sentence. Superman, Thor, the green behemoth (I'm just going to call him the Hulk for convenience), and Doomsday. We know from the implicit but clear intent that Thor and the Hulk are meant to be characters crossing over from the Marvel Universe. If one were to assume that the "who" from "who dies" is the Hulk, then who are "these invaders"? Doomsday is native to the DC Universe just like Superman, so why would he be referred to as one of "these invaders"? The invaders are Thor and the Hulk, which were already grouped together earlier in the sentence ("Thor (...) and a green behemoth"). The sentence additionally establishes that Superman is fighting both Thor and the Hulk, so why would the Hulk sacrifice himself to protect Superman if he's one of his opponents?

The description of the event is brief, so I can see you considering that maybe at one point of this supposed story, Hulk switches sides, but let's apply Occam's razor. Try to picture the scenario. The idea that Superman fights Thor and the Hulk, but somehow Doomsday enters into the scene and fights alongside Thor against the Hulk who must have had a change of heart to help Superman is convoluted. On the other hand, Thor and the Hulk arriving and fighting Superman with Doomsday then appearing into the scene to save him is much more straightforward and requires the least amount of shots in the dark.