Thread:Koavf/@comment-11220539-20170620060143/@comment-4651179-20170620220243

The main problem I see here is that even though the issue has been official released through the Collector Corps initiative, you're basing your edits on details provided by a third-party (Bleeding Cool).

While not specified in our policies, it's expected that users have read the material they're contributing about. In addition to this information having been taken from a third-party, Bleeding Cool didn't provide all details from the issue. So even if you add every detail disclosed by Bleeding Cool in the article, you're limited by what Bleeding Cool released. They showed a handful of pages, not all of them.

Additionally, even then you didn't add every detail from the article, but simply the appearances of three characters. The article at Bleeding Cool provides the evidence for the appearances of other three characters, in addition to some locations and items.

That's the second issue at hand I see here. It's also expected for users to fully complete the appearances lists in comic articles they edit, or at least to contribute as much as they can. Even if you argue that you can't provide every appearance due to Bleeding Cool only showing a couple of pages, you did disregard listing the appearances of other characters.

Contributing with every piece of information that is within your reach is not a policy, but making an effort to do so makes the difference between a good contribution and doing the bare minimum.

The appearances lists provide a quick run-down of things going on in a comic. Omitting information does lead to a form of false information being displayed. It's not like you added that the Guardians of the Galaxy appeared, but by not adding that Ant-Man appeared, it fosters the misconception that Ant-Man didn't appear.