Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-61022-20161213202224/@comment-16461120-20170213235041

This is a problem, in part because it very much appears to me to be one person's opinion being stated as agreed upon community consensus policy, when I don't recall it ever being discussed, and for more than a year we've been telling users that these types of appearances should always be listed in the order in which they actually appear, i.e. not grouped.

Anyway, just so that I'm clearly on the record if the discussion is going to actually happen, I oppose arbitrary grouping in the Other Characters section because it is unnecessarily convoluted and it also makes determining what something might be a much more difficult task for those less familiar with the content when there are fewer chronological cues available for them to follow while attempting to identify a subject.