Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20180921212157/@comment-61022-20181004023355

My opinion a ban, regardless of the reason, should be dictated by the quality of work the person being banned has provided. It's been my experience that most people who get banned for breaking the rules are not providing quality edits.

What is considered "quality edits" should be something quantified by the admins. I'd say that in the case of Gipdac, he has been told multiple times to stop certain behaviours and circumvented a ban to create what I assume were more crap edits, because I trust the judgement of the other admins.

That said, I feel that if we un-ban this user we're going to have to babysit all his edits, which takes time away from more important work.