Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-61022-20160330220251/@comment-61022-20160401143402

I say we go with what the handbook says. Again, it's Brevoort's position. until there's an official retraction in another handbook or stated in comic, we go with what has been stated in the fiction. How hard is this for everybody to understand?

While Brevoort *is* and editor, he is one person, and he (like many others who have held the job) will move onto other things and other writers and other editors will come and go and change things IN STORY as they please.

Putting Brevoort's comments into context: IF he said "Wolverine is really a frog that shoots confetti out of his butt" and that hasn't been stated in story or in a handbook, we're not going to go in and edit his profile because there is not a shred of evidence to support that in story.

Also, if you read the finally party of Time Runs Out, Sue and the FF kids get swallowed up in the incursion. Then at the end the Sue that was "married to Doom" is the same one with Reed Richards at the end helping restructure the multiverse. Who isn't reading what correctly? It does not make ANY sense that this is just an alternate since every story framed it such that Sue was the one from 616. Jonathan Hickman seems to be pretty clear on this. It also doesn't make any logical sense that Doom brainwashed Johnny and Ben, Val, and Franklin yet took an alternate Sue as a wife? What an asinine position to have.

It's in the Handbook, so we go with the handbook. Otherwise Wolverine is a frog that shoots confetti out of his butt.