User blog comment:Mr. Xemnas/2 seperate marevl cinematic universe's?????/@comment-1895174-20130201050316/@comment-3317214-20130204005850

You didn't think that was big, epic, and conclusive? How?

As to your point on "Bane the movie"- Nope. Not even. Man, the whole crippling thing was great for showing the humanity of Batman. Not only that, it was a great story. And no matter how much screen time Bane has, it's not as much as Batman. If you've seen Sherlock, you wouldn't be complaining about the hero's unexplained survival. And there's no REAL Batman. And I thought it was fitting that this Batman did what he did in the end.

I think that if you were disappointed in it, it's probably because you thought that it could be better than TDK, which is a ridiculous thing to expect of any movie. I don't follow CBM, but what I see in YouTube, Facebook, and my friends, noone thought it was disappointing at all. We all knew it would be hard to follow TDK, but it did a good job of it.

Lastly, why are you even comparing it to Spider-Man 3? My response to that idea is as follows (although I suppose it's a little opinionated, I'm not alone in thinking it): Is TDKR a masterpiece? No, but I think it's damn close. Is TDK a masterpiece? Yes. You would agree, no? Is Spider-Man 3 a a masterpiece? Nope. Not even a good movie. Is Spider-Man 2 a masterpiece? No, not even close. It's only kinda good. There's no sequel to TDKR because that's where Nolan finished the trilogy. But there's no sequel to SM3 because it was a bad movie. Plain and simple.