User blog comment:ZachWadeWilson/Victor/@comment-1895174-20130917055407/@comment-1713281-20130918032718

Ok. You can't just put an interpretation on a rule to fit an argument, even if the rule's wording is vague. Nathan's (Peteparker's) post that you linked makes no mention on blogs, and for good reason; blog have never been an issue when it comes to fanon.

The only users that have been shown the door for Fanon are:
 * Users that make pages for their own creations or themselves
 * Users, most often those that attempt to role-play as an established character via their account name, who update existing profiles with info about "themselves" or their fanon version of said character
 * Users that role-play in general that only blow up the recent activity thread with blog comments, message wall posts and talk page messages "in character".

Now, I'm inclined to think that Nathan will disagree with you about 'no blogs with fanon', but I'm not Nathan, so I can't speak for him.