Thread:Shabook/@comment-3406131-20170330083011/@comment-3406131-20170331084012

Well, I'm still not agreeing at 100% (but again, my fault for not following the thread) on each case (on the other side, I have created pages with capital letters at each word despite informal name in the past...).

But because of this policy about character pages' names, it seems to me even more important to distinguish a simple designation that we use to refer to a character from a codename. Instead of distinguishing it in the notes, we can do it from the start by using the title field.

To me, the distinction goes pretty much this way (all case are "for a character who has only that name as a way to refer to it): That's how I see it when I go on the page and check the title field.
 * Red Flamingo (proper noun): The character has that name pretty much established (by himself, or maybe by the narration)
 * "Red Flamingo" (proper noun): The character has that name given by someone, serving as an alias/nickname
 * "Red flamingo" (in title field)/"red flamingo" (in text) (common name): The character is referred to with a common name, and

Little note: for the title, the nature of that field doesn't allow to have a little note in the infobox (if you were talking about fields such as RealNameRef), but we can have the information in the notes field.