Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24800939-20190724011416/@comment-4651179-20190817181233

Based on Undoniel's points, I'm okay with keeping family categories that are relevant due to the complexity or notoriety of the family tree. I know it sounds vague to suggest keeping something based on notoriety since it's subjective, but I doubt any of you would find issue deleting any of the categories that are in the level of Category:Todd Family (I'm not linking it directly to avoid the hussle of editing this message to remove the link once the category is deleted).

I would like to propose to go ahead with the place an embargo on the creation of family categories and the deletion of the categories that are outright superfluous (like the aforementioned Category:Hill Family). I'm suggesting this because I just noticed that only today we've got eight new family categores.