Thread:Undoniel/@comment-44509294-20200219180357/@comment-3406131-20200220202306

Hi!

I've undid your edit on Arthur Molekevic (Earth-1610), as it was based on an unreferenced information added before (the page doesn't has a reference for "Belgrave, Serbia").

It seems that mentions the fact of Arthur being born in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. But even then, it doesn't make him a Serbian (as a citizenship) automatically: (apart from being an american,) he is maybe a serbian dual-citizen, or was yugoslavian but never serbian, and was born in Belgrade but from another citizenship (or even another nationality or ethnicity, or anything). My rule in this case is to focus on more-or-less explicit content (such as an handbook entry). More implicit or hinted stuff sometimes ends up being developed in notes or trivia (which can be linked from the relevant section, like here, the "see notes" in the "relatives"' section).

It's still unclear how the nationalities/ethnicities are treated for modern-age peoples (the only example I see are the nationalities of UK, but IIRC, the debate had it a special case, but I can't found it back).

It's preferable to:
 * Avoid building on on unreferenced or unverified content (as it is a way to gradually distort the actual material from the media).
 * Always read the issue you're using as a reference.

The "nationality/ethnicity // citizenshio" thing bothers me, I think I will ask the admin team if anyone has any idea on dealing with this.

Have a good night/day.