User blog comment:Daken1979/Omega Level Mutants/@comment-3232065-20110112220742/@comment-3232065-20110114084225

this actually isnt the first blog to discuss what merits being classified as a omega. Johnnybrano44 said on the wiki get your character stats right blog from Corelli that a mutant had to be refrenced as being a omega by a reliable source and used xavier as an example of a reliable source. from there i then assumed that based on my previous refrence to xavier being called a omega by another omega mutant that him and the other two mutants i listed were therefore confirmed omegas. Although i have read hundreds of x-men comics im more of a spiderman expert so if theres anyone whos very familiar with the rules of mutant classification (there probably in the top 19 and johnnybravo44 is probably one of them) please clarify this issue. also its not like everything is always going to make perfect sense as far as cannon goes. the captain america comics were from ww2 and are considered earth 616 (its relevent cause even then there were mutant characters like namor) so unless you wanted to always have the same writers for the comics which wouldnt be possible the writers wont always get things right (dont even get me started on how there isnt supposed to be mutant skrulls)