Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20170415164119/@comment-112155-20170417194319

ADour wrote: As for my course of action, I see no problem with it. It simply followed Wikipedia's very own consensus-making procedure. See edit. Disagree with edit? Discuss edit. Reach concise consensus. I don't disagree with your course of action, of course you have the right to agree or disagree with any edit.

What I can't understand is that you blamed me, on a personal level, as my fault, of trying to impose my "personal preference", an argument you've repeated at least twice.

You keep saying, in this very thread, that it was "unilateral". As long as more than one was involved, it cannot be, by definition, unilateral.

I'm just asking to drop those kind of arguments in the future, for the sake of fulfilling the very purpose of this thread, to improve the discussions environment.