Thread:Shabook/@comment-3406131-20170330083011

Hi!

I think you don't understand the issue on the "glass girl".

It was listed here because it's the only way to name it. But as far, she was only referred to as "a glass girl" or "the glass girl". That's the only designation she was referred to, but she was never referred as "Glass Girl" as far. Thus, the naming convention to alias doesn't really apply.

To settle the problem, I've moved the "Glass girl" to the title field (in order to empty the current alias field) and still have a title to the page (I used that field in order to have the explanation of her current name in the currentaliasref field), and the references (with the fact she wasn't named as far) in the notes.

I agree with you a policy is required, but we should not try to apply non-applying policies to it as far. I recall there was some thread on the subject, do you happen to have a link to it ? 