Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-29354283-20150701162143

Primarch Guilliman wrote: Nausiated wrote: As for alignments: Equally as pointless. Commander Kazugeta, you've written at length and tediously about keeping them but I should point out that you have only been here since February this year. Versus me, I've been here for a decade, and I have been an admin for quite a while as well. Alignments are more trouble than they are worth and are just as pointless to list as fan ratings. They're subjective, arbitrary, and subject to change and the subject of many edit wars.

If someone can't figure out an alignment by reading the actual character profile, then perhaps they need to go back to reading comprehension. Nausiated, you clearly think your being here longer means your opinions are somehow infallible. Just because someone is newer to contributing to this particular wikia or wikias in general, doesn't not mean they are wrong & you can use your length of service to a particular wikia(s) as some sort of weapon to strengthen a weaker point. He brings a perspective that is less jaded & different to most others. You should pay more attention to the young bloods & not so quick to dismiss their views. Considering that Nausiated has been active on Wikia for far longer than either you or Kazugeta, might it be possible that he's a little more experienced? (Happy first post, BTW) Alignments are no longer official. We shouldn't have random users deciding who's "good" and who's "bad". The alignments were not removed to save money. If Marvel (one of the most successful comic book companies, if not the biggest) was strapped for cash, they wouldn't save by cutting a single line per entry. They certainly wouldn't remove it if it were an important one. The money saved would be negligible. Nausiated isn't making a "weaker point". He's suggesting that we remove outdated, no longer official information, or at the vary least, move it to Notes.