Board Thread:Policies/@comment-10473115-20150611004425/@comment-1895174-20150713002252

Sonicpie1 wrote: If a writer makes a story on how Venom for some reason becomes good, he's good. Simple as that. Thats been the case for alot of reformed villains for a while now. That's still a subjective measure. How much of a good guy does Venom need to be before he can be labeled as "good" and not "neutral"? How long does Venom need to be a hero before we can say he's more than just momentarily teaming up with Spider-Man? These are not questions with objective answers, so we can't expect for anyone - especially newer editors - to agree on them.