Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170310003740/@comment-10473115-20170317202834

Nausiated wrote: Everyone is ignoring that I've said that these concerns are minor -- at best -- and explain why. There are no dissenting opinions on my assessment on the situation other than concerns with no basis of fact. Your opinions are very valid. I believe that there's much more work to do to get everything right without making those flashbacks minor. However, me and LoveWaffle have gave a reason to why we shouldn't recategorize those old tags. Because a missing appearance is more harmful than a false one. Sometimes wikis improve in a chaotic way so you don't have to feel any pressure to correct those wrong tags, In your words, there's much more important things to correct.

I think that wrong categorization to minor/major isn't a big issue to the reader but researcher might miss an important comic. I tried to give a good reasons for my vote because I know what you're talking about. I've felt that I've lost votings because of false arguments and or without any arguments or answers at all. *Resisting desire to link* Biggest reason for that is our lack in art of debating as we haven't encouraged that and are reaping the results now. Many years policies were decided on admins's personal walls and only more complicated questions were brought to the discussion between other admins. Other users were told not to participate on that. And when the resolution was decided, nobody cared to write it to a policy page as staff already knew it.