Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-867021-20121206190359/@comment-61371-20121208174120

I don't think a minimum number of edits should be required. I'd MUCH rather have someone make a few quality edits over a large number of okay, or passable edits.

Minimum contribution time? I'd agree with that. I think we actually have that as it is, with it (generally) being six months. I think there have been a few good editors we've missed out on because of that, but who knows, they may have left either way.

I have no issue with moving admins from active to inactive (and six months seems fair). That's just good policy as far as letting the regular members know who they can actively contact. But I can't say I'm for stripping people of their powers. Not for anything less than two to five years of inactivity. And, honestly, last I heard, we COULDN'T strip them of admin powers, which is why making them admins was such a big deal to begin with (few people we would have taken chances on, or added sooner if it could be undone).