Thread:ADour/@comment-61022-20171105023031/@comment-61022-20171109213303

You mean this?

ADour wrote: Repeating myself, editorial intent is that they didn't meet when Sue was so young. That presumption goes against facts established by Marvel themselves.

and

Urging readers to ignore Marvel's decision is wrong. Specially considering it was a conscious retcon that has been adressed, explained and reinforced by Marvel themselves.

Again, how is this different than the Iron Man and Spider-Man references I made above?

Also, to your comments on being address, explained, and reinforced. It was mentioned once... In 2013... and never spoken of again. That's hardly reinforcement.

Also, Annibelle changed my typo from "should" to "could".

I don't know why you are belaboring your points any further, they have been addressed.

Annibelle wrote: I don't know if you truly expect others to believe you're not intentionally being a jerk, or don't really give a damn if they think that, but I would ask that you please make the effort to realize it's not just one or two that feel you're seemingly always combative and potentially convinced tact is superfluous. We're your peers and I suspect everybody would rather get along with you than dread where the next interaction might lead.

Well, I'm sorry that people feel this way. I can't help how people interpret what I say. Not that it's anyone's business, but I'm on the spectrum, so social queues are not a forte of mine, especially in a written medium.