Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-1713281-20121209010037/@comment-1671874-20121210055712

I did my best on these, so here goes:

Minor Characters - I agree with Nausiated on the "unique" part here. Random SHIELD agents should not sustain their own page. I'd accept them having a glossary page though simply a mention on a full SHIELD page would help me sleep at night better. But certain one-appearance characters like Tommy the Morlock are worth having their own page I say. Tommy was a unique mutant whose death started the Mutant Massacre (retcons aside), she's been shown in many handbooks/alternate timelines/television shows and with flashbacks, seen even as recent as Uncanny X-Men #529. Other random one-appearance characters, such as Richard Salmons the Hellfire Club member she was with, I'd say do not sustain enough information for a page. But a glossary page? I don't know, still seems like a lot for certain characters.. but it is tough to draw a line on where.. O.O

Commercial/Liscensed Properties and Actors - I could take these either of two ways: 1) All liscensed properties/actors' names are linked to Wikipedia and we act like they don't exist here (basically). or 2) All liscensed properties/actors are given a short summary on a glossary page. I prefer the former option, but I wouldn't mind the latter on either of these. I am scared that people would take it too far, however.

Imprint Content - I say leave it the way it is. Generally if they're simply published by Marvel for a short time, it's more or less understood by those in power that they may only have it for a short while. Things can get tricky with permanent combinations like past Disney comics not published by Marvel, but I say we just leave out all that is not published by Marvel.

Pre-Marvel Era - I say it's sadly the easiest route to follow in Marvel's footsteps and turn a blind eye on the majority-if not all-of this. If Marvel doesn't acknowledge it, why should we? Seems like a waste of time almost.