Thread:ADour/@comment-61022-20171105023031/@comment-4651179-20171109215448

In the case of Iron Man's origin, the annotation doesn't urge the reader to make an assumption as to which version of the events is the "correct" one. The annotation in Sue's page does elaborate that the reader could assume Sue and Reed still met when she was 13. The annotation in Iron Man's page doesn't do something similar.

You probably missed my rebuttal for the "it was in 2013 and happened once" argument since it was in my last message, which you tried to remove. As I said in said reply, "the age of the story is completely irrelevant. I would also say it shouldn't be ignored that there haven't been Fantastic Four stories since 2015. Even then, the retcon was referenced in a second instance. In Fantastic Four' Vol 5 #14, to be precise. You'll probably say it's not valid because the scene where it happened was being seen from the POV of the Quiet Man, but I already made it clear I find that logic unsound."

I'm aware that Annabell slightly tweaked the annotation and corrected the alleged typo. But I still oppose bringing up the possibility. If the reader wants to assume Reed and Sue met when she was 13, they are free to do it. But that's not what Marvel intends and bringing up that possibility goes beyond simply laying all cards on the table regarding Sue and Reed's first meeting.