Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1713281-20140523065821/@comment-1895174-20140528152533

ProfessorKilroy wrote: LoveWaffle wrote: ProfessorKilroy wrote: LoveWaffle wrote: ProfessorKilroy wrote: LoveWaffle wrote: That's the gist of the new timeline. A new timeline where Apocalypse was resurrected, where Jean never went crazy on us, and where Taylor Kitsch is instead Channing Tatum.

And because Jean never went crazy on us, we know X2 couldn't have happened. Or, just could've ended differently. Which means it didn't happen. Not as a whole, no. But noone's saying that, dude. Most of the movie could still happen. Doesn't mean it will. It just could. That's actually exactly what they're saying. When you suggest X2 takes place in the new timeline, you're suggesting X2 takes place in the new timeline. But, for multiple reasons, it can't happen. No one's saying events roughly similar to those in that movie can't happen in the new timeline. No, but someone's being awfully pedantic about the way in which we're describing what's going on. It's exactly what he was talking about, the problem here is that someone decided to jump into a discussion without knowing what he's talking about because he likes to be a contrarian.