Board Thread:Policies/@comment-2054358-20130409132104/@comment-2054358-20200207050124

AnnabellRice wrote: It wasn't a licensed Marvel property, it was Marvel property licensed for use in a non-Marvel (Disney) property (prior to Disney's acquisition of Marvel). It's like choosing not to cover Marvel Hot Wheels, i.e. just because Mattel has a license to produce Marvel merchandise doesn't make them Marvel property.

(The FOX films are somewhat different because Marvel has chosen to say they exist wholly within the Marvel multiverse and are not simply Marvel within some other multiverse.)

That first sentence sounds like the exact same thing to me. And while the part about the multiverse may excuse the numbered licensed universes, they hardly excuse the licensed stuff with TRNs. If Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse has its own E-616, E-1610 and E-65 that contradict the comics' Earth-616, Earth-1610 and Earth-65, wouldn't that be another multiverse?