Thread:Johnnybravo44/@comment-1713281-20130116194952/@comment-1713281-20130127205044

Well, since CrossGen was small and short-lived, it didn't have a ton of titles (Comic Book Database lists 52 individual titles).

Trolling thru the site, I cam across this listing, which is the Marvel imprint of CrossGen, and not the original publisher. All three listed there are new volumes of original CrossGen comics.

As far as characters and the like go, I don't know how covering them would work. I've never read a CrossGen issue, so it may as well be Chinese to me, but the listings in the first link shows a number of small groups of series that common sense would say group together (Masters of the Universe, Archard's Agents, DemonWars, etc.), though I don't know if the entire company shared continuity. However, this will likely open up the constant discussion of whether we cover imprint characters, and the usual suspects will come up again (Kick-Ass, Men in Black, any of the dozens of Epic and Icon series).

Along the same lines, imprints of purchased publishers. I mentioned Aircel and Eternity above, both imprints of Malibu that were acquired in the purchase. Malibu also has Adventure Comics, Bravura, Full Moon, Platinum Editions, Rock-It Comix, and of course Ultraverse (although some of these may be lines, like Marvel Illustrated, and not true imprints; more research could be done.) Additonally, CrossGen had an imprint called Code 6. My question is if these imprints are technically owned by Marvel (or owned by a property owned by Marvel, if you wanna split hairs), should we be covering their issues as well? Characters for all these is a big reach, but that can be disussed later if we cover the comic issues themselves.

Personally I think it'd be good for us. It's a huge page count boost, and to a smaller degree, it'd likely be a traffic boost as well, since someone searching this stuff out would find it here on an established wiki.