User blog comment:Hellhamer/So...Daredevil is back at home!/@comment-1895174-20130424010858/@comment-1895174-20130424165916

''As you already know, "weaker" doesn't mean "less interesting". Likewise, "stronger" doesn't mean "more interesting". I don't need to prove that to you. Or anyone. But your whole point seems to be based around the idea that "weaker" does mean "less interesting". So, I'm confused.''

Because if they don't add anything to the Avengers lineup, there's no reason to include them. I couldn't imagine Fury telling his team, "You're up against the biggest threat this world has ever seen, but this blind guy with a stick is the key to defeating it."

Also, it hasn't been that long since Spirit of Vengeance came out, so Sony still has the Ghost Rider rights.

They got the rights to Punisher back not all that long after War Zone came out. It all depends on whether or not Sony gave them back.

Wouldn't they make more money by attaching them to the Avengers brand?

Not necessarily, no. Being connected to that brand didn't help any of the films in the past. We'd need to wait for Thor: The Dark World to come out to see how much being part of that universe helps now that The Avengers is out and Guardians of the Galaxy to see how a new franchise fairs. Even then, those two films are going to be held back by their release dates.

And if it's not Isaiah Mustafa playing T'Challa, I will be deeply disappointed.

I disagree. Black Panther needs to be portrayed by an African actor, or at very least one with the acting chops to pull it off.