Thread:Nurdboy42/@comment-27061671-20190101183019

I'm assuming the rollback on my edits to this page also has to do with the message i received on my wall about references. I just wanted to point out that the powers section I edited contains no other references, not a single one, and yet it's there completely in full and remains unremoved so I'm wondering why the additional information I added requires references when none of the rest of that section has them and the majority of the pages I've seen on this wiki have pretty sparse references that often aren't even accurate.

If I added a reference to every single edit I made on that page you'd be looking at about a dozen or more, many of them citing the exact same issue sometimes multiple times per line which just clutters up the page and what is the point in including references when the page they source to has no synopsis, information or anything besides a name and publication info that would back up the validity of the reference in the first place? Supposedly it has to do with 'having the information we display referenced is what makes us a reliable source of knowledge' but when the reference directs you to a mostly empty page that doesn't make it anymore valid, which is coming from someone whose been a librarian 