Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-4651179-20180806025410/@comment-4651179-20180817210255

Both of them add basic information to a page when they create it (for the most part; I just noticed Jasonmaia is leaving some History sections empty in his most recent contributions). Additionally, they both focus on extremely minor characters whose articles can't even have much information added.

A lot of times more experienced members of the community end up fleshing out stubs crated by new users. Deletion of stubs has never been decisive, but we need at the very least to establish that the wiki doesn't commend lazy editing practises.

We can encourage editors to improve stubs, but we need to make clear that if a user can avoid making a stub in the first place is better.