Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-10473115-20170214023153/@comment-1895174-20170214225142

Nausiated responded to some of the questions raised about his post, and I find these two parts of his response problematic (for lack of a better term):

On the discussions about mention tags, I was never privy to any of the discussions about the creation of said tag, let along how it was implemented. I can tell you that had I been part of those discussions I would have never agreed to said tag because it's a useless reference, especially when you compare it to the amount of information that is missing on this site. While I can agree that it was not discussed at any great length. Not grouping thing by order of appearance type in the other category creates a visual mess.

From an aesthetics standpoint, it looks sloppy and unprofessional. I find the idea that people are okay with that sort of sloppiness embarrassing. I don't think his reasons for having his preferences are unfair. The problem is that he's using the opportunity provided by announcing the new rules to unilaterally change other policies based on those preferences.

(And just to make something clear: I have no strong feelings one way or the other about mentions automatically going to the bottom of the category or chronologically mixing them in with the other appearances. I've done both, I'm comfortable with both, I don't have a preference.)