Board Thread:Policies/@comment-16461120-20170104212625/@comment-4651179-20170123094512

In that case a consensus should still be reached.

Why would it be necessary to differentiate aliases from honorifics in the page's title when the article itself would make it clear whether the "Mister" is being used as part of an alias or as a honorific for lack of full name? (Not to mention in some cases the "Mister" being part of an alias is a given, e.g. "Mister Negative," "Mister Miracle," "Mister Abnormal")

My main doubt is what would happen with other types of honorifics? Should pages that use "Professor" as a honorific be renamed to "Prof." and pages that use "Captain" as a honorific be renamed to "Capt."?