Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-7823447-20140508223520/@comment-6548012-20140927092405

Zakor1138 wrote: FrenchTouch wrote: Wow. If you both can read my post again, you can see "(whoever chooses 'em)". Which means that, whoever is taking care of that movie, nothing was respected in a matter of cinematographic work, and that most of Disney/Sony MARVEL movies are objectively bad. As comic books adaptations, they might be cool. But as movies, Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2 was more of a masterpiece than those. Oh great... a purist. I don't know how the "Disney" movies are bad as movies. You're just upset that it's not a perfect telling of the comics. That's really annoying. Comparing these films to a B-movie is insulting, as a lot of work was put into these films so they could entertain both comic fans and the average moviegoer.

Also, the "Disney" films are actually made by Marvel Studios, meaning that you're basically telling Marvel themselves their films are terrible. The thing is, I'm the exact opposite of what you just said. So, before making any rushed conclusions, read again. Those movies are almost live action comic books, and that is the HUGE problem with it! It has no quality as a movie, all of the movies are too rushed and are made like comic books, and that's why movies where Frank Miller worked on suck, because he's just made live action comic books, instead of proper movies. I have nothing against the fact it has nothing to do with the comic books. But, I am fully against it being a comic book.