Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1713281-20140523065821/@comment-3317214-20140602231813

LoveWaffle wrote: It's exactly what he was talking about, the problem here is that someone decided to jump into a discussion without knowing what he's talking about because he likes to be a contrarian. Although I do like taking a contrary position, I don't do it for the sake of being contrary. I do it because I legitimately disagree with you. You know that he wasn't suggesting that every single event in X2 happened. And you also know that if he was, he most likely forgot about Jean's death (because it's impossible for all of the events of X2 to have happened, but it's quite possible that most of it did - which is what he was suggesting), and doesn't need telling twice that "technically" X2 didn't happen. And I didn't need telling, because I wasn't implying that all of X2 happened either, meaning that you probably didn't disagree with my original statement. So, wouldn't that make you a contrarian?