Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-16461120-20170221234010/@comment-16461120-20170416215230

I agree that this thread is an example of what to avoid. Part of the problem specifically here is that it wasn't actually my proposal, rather a rushed summary of my understanding of previous discussions of others' ideas that for the most part took place before my time on the site, so by my taking the initiative to kickstart movement on the subject, rather than leaving that to those who could more adequately explain what they wanted to see develop, the process has been chaotic and my choice of thread name and initial wording were obviously flawed.

That being said, if you're able to discern "missing" votes, then by all means add them to the roll call, and I reiterate my belief that we need to clearly define how community consensus should progress, so that people aren't confused as to what stage we're in going forward, or conversely, we can throw out this thread and start over on the subject if people feel that's best?