Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-166-20191106043111/@comment-166-20200217223602

Thank you everyone for weighing in!

It seems like there's no perfect consensus to be had, but I do sense a few themes of opinion:
 * We believe allowing them back is still a major risk.
 * If allowed to come back, they would be on 'thin ice.'
 * The ban could be shortened, but not lifted yet (6 months & 12 months were proposed).
 * The 'victim mentality' is not appropriate or helpful and must end.

If we can agree a compromise is possible, I'd like to suggest the following:
 * 1) The ban will be reduced from indefinite to 1 year from the original ban date (Oct 16th?).
 * 2) An unconditional, unqualified acknowledgement of wrongdoing and final apology must be made.
 * 3) They must agree that following the ban, they are on indefinite probation. If a further ban becomes necessary, it would be indefinite, with no further appeal.

What does everyone say? Please respond with a 'yay,' 'nay,' or suggested amendment to my proposal.