Thread:Nausiated/@comment-32978104-20171031220110

Hi, so I've been blocked from editing and updating Susan Storm's Expanded History page by you and noticed that you had reverted her origin story with Reed to the John Byrne version from the 1980s, which is no longer official Marvel canon and hasn't been for several years. Sue was aged up to her late teens in Fantastic Four Vol 4 #4 in 2013, an editorial decision that was made by Tom Brevoort because Byrne's origin is an entirely inappropriate, sexist, offensive, and creepy story. It does not make sense to keep inaccurate and outdated information on Sue's page that even Marvel has discarded. It is misleading to people who read her page seeking--one must surmise--official, contemporary canon. Which the Byrne origin--where Sue is 13--no longer is. What, exactly, is your justification for keeping an outdated, deeply sexist origin story that has been retconned out of continuity by Marvel itself on her page as anything other than a footnote? I simply do not believe there are any. The Byrne origin is incredibly creepy and disturbing, and there's no reason to favor it over official, actual canon. 