I saw this has been done on the Star Wars Fandom, I don't know if it's allowed, but it's just to have fun. Rules are simple : give him a wrong name:
I saw this has been done on the Star Wars Fandom, I don't know if it's allowed, but it's just to have fun. Rules are simple : give him a wrong name:
*gasp* how dareth thou? thoust be condemned to the darkest parts of the Stan Lee Underworld, in which the lame versions of his characters reside.
It must be a lonely place. Stan Lee didn't create a whole lot of characters in the first place
Okay I understand you dislike stan Lee but he had a hand in creating a lot of characters
Stan Lee never really directly created characters, but he co-created: Spider-Man, Fantastic Four, X-Men, Daredevil, and many others.
Wait why does Fatebuoy dislike Stan the Man?
I dont know
My comment was supposed to sound more light-hearted and there are many articles and videos already on the subject of Stan Lee
The extent of Stan Lee's creativity is only giving the names and dialogue to the characters that artists have already drawn up
Artists like Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko would already have drawn up stories already and Stan Lee would simply put in words to those stories
It's like telling a friend's personal story and then claiming it as your own
Not really...
Okay think of it like this. An artist makes a character, and the general idea. They make art for this character that gives them personality, and other stuff.
Then a writer has to make up stories, ideas, character arcs, and all of those things. Sure, the artist has a massive part in the making of a character, probably more so than a writer, but the writer has a handle on most things after that.
The artist should most definitely get attention and credit for their work, but does that mean that the writer didn't actually create the character? No.
The writer makes smaller details, dialogue, and other things that makes a character feel either more real, or just better in some way. Stan may have just taken stories that an artist did and put dialogue to it, but he made small details and ideas that make the character what it is.
Yeah, Stan Lee didn't do any of that. It was through the many writers and stories over the years that gave the characters the small details of who they are now
Even Lee's later creations didn't amount to much because it didn't have the creative spark that Kirby would input into his characters
I'm sorry, Hostess, I'm about to pass out. I'll probably read your piece before calling it a night
Well, that's definitely Rory Regan.
What do you think?