Why is it that no character addresses or seems to care about the fact that Blade has killed and probably still kills children? Lmao
Sure, they’re *vampire* children but they’re still... children... Not that I believe that it’s okay to kill adults but at least an adult is better equipped to defend themselves lmao
"Fuck them kids, man"
LMFAOOO
I guess it depends on how old those “children” are. If we’re talking about a kid who was just turned, sure there are some moral qualms there.
The trope of a hundred plus year old vampire in the form of a child is not a moral issue as it’s only a child in appearance - it’s more to create dramatic tension either for the vampire killer (killing a monster that looks like a child), or from outsiders misunderstanding.
Havent heard Ispy in a long time lol
When you put it that way, I suppose it makes more sense. I don’t recall us ever getting much details about the “nature” of the children but, if they really were children physically and adults mentally due to just not aging, I don’t see much of a problem there.
Vampires aren't alive so, technically, Blade isn't murdering anyone
Well, let us say, for the sake of arguments they were possessed as opposed to turned... Have you seen "Case 39"? In such a case, whoever offs that kid should get a medal...
Vampire children, as in the off-spring of Vampires, I don't believe I have ever seen... But, if they are as dangerous as their parents, fuck 'em.
What do you think?
