Idk i like to just enjoy the games for what they are. I dont expect 100% accuracy or for it to reinvent the field, just for it to be fun
I thought the Arkham games were very accurate. What did you not like about it?
They were good but nothing really changed between the games enough. The first two were good but it got progressively worse
Okay... Batman had a fairly empty utility belt at the beginning of the game, and somehow his equipment was scattered throughout the levels.
Yeah it was a weird thing like he just never carried all his items. It was kind of dumb.
From my memory he had most of them in Arkham knight.
Arkem jnight was dumb af though. 90% if the game takes place in the batmobile, story was predictable, the combinations for quick tool use became too complicated and there was two many to use easily. The game was lackluster in every way.
Let’s not forget who the Arkham Knight was. Is it even a spoiler if I say who it was? You can see it coming a mile away. I thought the graphics were amazing and the batmobile(when casually driving) was fun. I loved all the Easter eggs especially the Birds of prey clock tower.
Yeah graphics were good, the batmobile was fun but it was way too integral to the game. Like you couldnt do anything in the game without it. Nearly every mission needed it.
This looks awesome! I cannot wait. It's one of 5 games this year I am hyped for.
What do you think?