Is this another sock puppet account with @Djdidifudowpe2828 and @Jasjsisososp2992 ?

@Xaxafrad yes 😭

Technology can be annoying.

The 2nd Thanos Infinity trilogy (Siblings, Conflict, and Ending) are not canon to 616. They are canon to TRN803 and 81488.

The "good" Thanos doesn't have his own page yet, but the "bad" Thanos does, https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Thanos_(Earth-81488)

@Xaxafrad but i thought the good thanos was earth-616 also doesn't that story defy TOAA cause it says hes only omnipotent in a functional system or something which just does not make sense.

Not 616, that was Thanos-TRN803

Ye just saw that but still dont answer how it contradicted TOAA

If I had an answer for that question, I would've included it. Maybe the writer made a continuity mistake, or maybe the writer chose to ignore that part of the continuity. And I have no clue what a Watsonian answer would look like.

Ye i just looked it up and the editor said it weren’t in continuity at all

@Xaxafrad what is a Watsonian answer 😭

It means an answer using in-universe context, named after Dr. Watson's expositions in the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. In contrast to Doylist explanations, which use the real world as a context.