I will defend this movie till the grave.
I will defend this movie till the grave.
It turns out that New Line Cinema allowed Marvel to reclaim the rights to create an Iron Man movie because they believed the character "didn’t make sense since Iron Man was too heavy to fly".
Do you Agree or Disagree?
Reply with your:
First Comic Book:
First Comic Book Movie/show:
Favorite Comic Book:
Favorite Comic Book Movie/show:
If only One couple has to leave and never come back, which one are you choosing?
This is going to be the worst day in comic book history for Daredevil fans.
Disney+ Improves She-Hulk CGI Quality of New Trailer (Photos)
Marvel Studios released the first trailer for She-Hulk: Attorney at Law on the show's Disney+ page, but the difference is that it features an improved video quality in comparison to the compressed 1080p version uploaded on YouTube. The following photos showcase noticeable differences in the CG work done on this series after fans voiced complaints about the trailer's CGI upon its debut.
As She-Hulk looks at her phone, fans can see that her face has more definition in her nose and cheekbones while the lighting gives her skin different shades of green.
The point-of-view shot of She-Hulk looking at her phone screen shows significant improvements. The Disney+ version of the trailer allows viewers to see the pores on her face and more contrast between the pupil and the green in her eyes, in addition to her individual hairs.
And finally, the trailer's final close-up shot gives Maslany's face even more details, once again showing the texture of her forehead, cheeks, chin, and nose. It even makes the reflection in her eyes more clear and adds a pop of color to some of the green in her hair.
So what do you guys think of these changes to the design for the character She-Hulk? Do you think the changes are minimal and hardly make a difference, or do you think these small details better the design overall?
Does anyone have an image of Venom impaling Carnage with his Necrosword?