It's clear that this reality is the one and the same with Earth-6799, Slott just retconnig realities.--Primestar3 (talk) 14:07, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

I also at first thought that they were the same. But, Slott could have just put two '9' behind the '67' if it really is Earth-6799, so the two universe are probably different.Ultraman TopFan (talk) 14:27, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
I think we won't sure, unless if I ask that to Slott in Twitter and I already did.--Primestar3 (talk) 14:33, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
I don't understand what you said. Do you mean that he said that Earth-6799 and Earth-67 are the same?Ultraman TopFan (talk) 14:36, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
No, I meant I just asked him that question on Twitter.(Sorry for my english).Primestar3 (talk) 14:40, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Did he reply?Ultraman TopFan (talk) 16:19, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
You forget: Slott did already say he was treating the Marvel Universe Appendix and other databases as non-canon and retconning the Universe designations not already featured in the comics. That makes it fairly obvious that Earth-67 is supposed to be the 1967 cartoon with the designation retconned to streamline the Multiverse and reference the year it came out. There's support for this in TAS #11, too: Peter from the Ultimate cartoon says that based on the pastel pallet and the vintage cars, it's like he and Miles in a cartoon from the 1960's. Arawn 999 (talk) 09:51, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
Clearly what I tried to say. Thanks.--Primestar3 (talk) 14:38, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. Thus far the wiki's policy has been to disregard Slott's retcons as alternate universes, so I'd say leave it for now. Arawn 999 (talk)
OK.--Primestar3 (talk) 14:56, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.