Marvel Database
Register
Advertisement

To whoever tried to reinstate the vampire Bush pic: I very clearly ennumerated my reasons for replacing it, namely that said pic had nothing to do with the Bush of Earth-616 (unless I'm mistaken, it was a cover for the Village Voice, which falls well beyond Marvel's domain.) - Gnostic 21:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you, the picture is non-cannon, though funny. If you look at the history of a page, you can see who did it :o
--Your Friendly Neighborhood Peteparker (talkcontribsemail) 22:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

bull[]

This is not Wikipedia damn it so can we loose the liberal bias .If barack obama's page gets an alignment of good then bush should get one too or obama should be changed to neutral

Unless every one here is cowards and are afraid of being called racists. Since that is the only defense that obama cultist seem to have .--Xion1212 03:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)xion1212


Obama's only been in office for two months. Bush was in for eight years. Plus, in 616 lore, Bush authorized the use of supervillains to take down unregistered heroes during the Civil War and the release of Norman Osbourne from prison (I won't even get into the matter of allowing a "reformed" Nazi to create homicidal clones...) Your complaints sound pretty biased under the circumstances.

- Gnostic 19:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Good, evil or neutral[]

Real world biases are not applicable here. In the context of the comic version, Bush is shown to make some poor decisions (the ones sited above, though they aren't made out of evil intent - if your intentions are good but you make poor decisions that go wrong then you are not evil, just foolish), and he's shown elsewhere to be a well-intentioned man (Priest's Black Panther, where he has differing political opinions from the regular cast, but debates them thoughtfully and reasonably). So I'd argue that neutral is most applicable here, or good (but with poor judgement), but certainly not evil. Lokiofmidgaard 09:17, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Advertisement